Enhancing L2 learners’ lexical gains via Quizlet learning tool: the role of individual differences

被引:0
作者
Long Quoc Nguyen
Ha Van Le
机构
[1] FPT University,
来源
Education and Information Technologies | 2023年 / 28卷
关键词
Quizlet; SLA; Lexical retention; Individual differences; Prior vocabulary knowledge; Working memory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Technology integration in second language acquisition (SLA) has become prevalent and prominent in the modern age. Quizlet has emerged as a vocabulary learning tool integrated not only into computers (CALL) but also into mobile phones (MALL), over the years; its effectiveness has already been proved via several quasi-experimental studies. However, such research is still limited; some did not even include a control group. Further, whether learners’ individual differences may have any impact on Quizlet effectiveness in promoting lexical gains remains unknown. To address these gaps, this study was conducted with the participation of 68 Vietnamese undergraduates, following a pretest-posttest design together with semi-structured interviews. While the control group (N = 35) reviewed lexical items in a conventional way, the experimental group (N = 33) used Quizlet for vocabulary revision. Prior to the five-week treatment, all participants took the pretest, receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge tests, and three working memory tests. When all revision sessions were completed, all participants took the posttest. Then, five random learners in the experimental group were invited to join the semi-structured interviews. Results showed that while revision on Quizlet led to greater lexical gains, working memory and prior vocabulary knowledge did not play any significant role in predicting such improvements. Pedagogical implications for teachers and recommendations for future research were also provided to address vocabulary retention, individual differences, and the use of Quizlet more effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:12143 / 12167
页数:24
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Arnold KM(2013)Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 39 940-839
  • [2] McDermott KB(2003)Working memory: looking back and looking forward Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 829-262
  • [3] Baddeley A(2022)Content manager for serious games: theoretical framework and digital platform Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research 2 251-736
  • [4] Barianos AK(2022)Incidental learning of single words and collocations through viewing an academic lecture Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44 708-190
  • [5] Papadakis A(2002)A dutch, computerized, and group administrable adaptation of the operation span test Psychologica Belgica 42 177-56
  • [6] Vidakis N(2016)Quizlet in the EFL classroom: enhancing academic vocabulary acquisition of japanese university students Teaching English with Technology 16 40-216
  • [7] Dang TNY(2015)Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012 ReCALL 27 197-126
  • [8] Lu C(2021)Learning vocabulary in spoken input-and output-based tasks TASK 1 100-19
  • [9] Webb S(2021)Incidental lexical mining in task repetition: the role of input, input repetition and individual differences System 103 102650-1160
  • [10] De Neys W(2015)Effective strategies for turning receptive vocabulary into productive vocabulary in EFL Context Journal of Education and Practice 6 10-523