Screening agars for MRSA: Evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

被引:9
作者
Micheel V. [1 ]
Hogan B. [2 ]
Köller T. [3 ]
Warnke P. [3 ]
Crusius S. [3 ]
Hinz R. [1 ]
Hagen R.M. [1 ]
Schwarz N.G. [2 ]
Frickmann H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] German Armed Forces Hospital of Hamburg, Department of Tropical Medicine at the Bernhard Nocht Institute, Hamburg
[2] Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Hamburg
[3] University Medicine Rostock, Institute for Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Rostock
关键词
CHROMagar; ChromID agar; Chromogenic agar; Hygiene; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Screening; Selective agar; Stepwise diagnostics;
D O I
10.1186/s40779-015-0046-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a hygiene risk that does not spare field hospitals or military medical field camps during military deployments. Diagnostic options for unambiguously identifying MRSA isolates are usually scarce in military environments. In this study, we assessed the stepwise application of two different selective agars for the specific identification of MRSA in screening analyses. Methods: Nasal swabs from 1541 volunteers were subjected to thioglycollate broth enrichment and subsequently screened on CHROMagar MRSA selective agar for the identification of MRSA. The MRSA identity of suspicious-looking colonies was confirmed afterwards or excluded by another selective agar, chromID MRSA. All isolates from the selective agars with MRSA-specific colony morphology were identified by biochemical methods and mass spectrometry. Results: The initial CHROMagar MRSA screening identified suspicious colonies in 36 out of 1541 samples. A total of 25 of these 36 isolates showed MRSA-like growth on chromID agar. Out of these 25 isolates, 24 were confirmed as MRSA, while one isolate was identified as Staphylococcus kloosii. From the 11 strains that did not show suspicious growth on chromID agar, 3 were methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, with one instance of co-colonization with Corynebacterium spp.), 2 were confirmed as MRSA (with 1 instance of co-colonization with MSSA), 2 were lost during passaging and could not be re-cultured, one could not be identified by the applied approaches, and the remaining 3 strains were identified as Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Staphylococcus hominis (co-colonized with Macrococcus caseolyticus) and Staphylococcus cohnii, respectively. Conclusions: The application of the selective agar CHROMagar MRSA alone proved to be too non-specific to allow for a reliable diagnosis of the presence of MRSA. The combined use of two selective agars in a stepwise approach reduced this non-specificity with an acceptably low loss of sensitivity. Accordingly, such a stepwise screening approach might be an option for resource-restricted military medical field camps. © 2015 Micheel et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Campbell K.M., Vaughn A.F., Russell K.L., Smith B., Jimenez D.L., Barrozo C.P., Et al., Risk factors for community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in an outbreak of disease among military trainees in San Diego, California, in 2002, J Clin Microbiol, 42, pp. 4050-4403, (2004)
[2]  
Albrich W.C., Harbarth S., Health-care workers: source, vector, or victim of MRSA?, Lancet Inf Dis, 8, pp. 289-301, (2008)
[3]  
Vento T.J., Calvano T.P., Cole D.W., Mende K., Rini E.A., Tully C.C., Et al., Staphylococcus aureus colonization of healthy military service members in the United States and Afghanistan, BMC Infect Dis, 13, (2013)
[4]  
Chambers H.F., Deleo F.R., Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era, Nature Rev Microbiol, 7, pp. 629-641, (2009)
[5]  
Dufresne G.W., Wells R.D., Pfaff J.A., The retrospective prevalence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in soft tissue abscesses at two military level I trauma centers, Mil Med, 173, pp. 945-948, (2008)
[6]  
Mediavilla J.R., Chen L., Mathema B., Kreiswirth B.N., Global epidemiology of community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA), Curr Opin Microbiol, 15, pp. 588-595, (2012)
[7]  
Humphreys H., Grundmann H., Skov R., Lucet J.C., Cauda R., Prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clin Microbiol Inf, 15, pp. 120-124, (2009)
[8]  
Gonzalez B.E., Rueda A.M., Shelburne S.A., Musher D.M., Hamill R.J., Hulten K.G., Community-associated strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococccus aureus as the cause of healthcare-associated infection, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 27, pp. 1051-1056, (2006)
[9]  
Rossney A.S., Herra C.M., Brennan G.I., Morgan P.M., O'Connell B., Evaluation of the Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay using the GeneXpert real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens, J Clin Microbiol, 46, pp. 3285-3290, (2008)
[10]  
Ciardo D.E., Burger S., Payer M., Lee C., McCallum N., GeneXpert captures unstable methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prone to rapidly losing the mecA gene, J Clin Microbiol, 48, pp. 3030-3032, (2010)