Equivalent linear logistic test models

被引:0
|
作者
Timo M. Bechger
Huub H. F. M. Verstralen
Norman D. Verhelst
机构
[1] Cito,
[2] National Institute for Educational Measurement,undefined
[3] Cito,undefined
来源
Psychometrika | 2002年 / 67卷
关键词
item response theory (IRT); linear logistic test model; Lagrange multiplier test;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper is about the Linear Logistic Test Model (LLTM). We demonstrate that there are infinitely many equivalent ways to specify a model. An implication is that there may well be many ways to change the specification of a given LLTM and achieve the same improvement in model fit. To illustrate this phenomenon, we analyze a real data set using a Lagrange multiplier test for the specification of the model. This Lagrange multiplier test is similar to the modification index used in structural equation modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 136
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] A Lagrange multiplier test for the mean stationarity assumption in dynamic panel-data models
    Magazzini, Laura
    Calzolari, Giorgio
    STATA JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (02): : 418 - 437
  • [32] A heteroskedasticity robust Breusch-Pagan test for Contemporaneous correlation in dynamic panel data models
    Halunga, Andreea G.
    Orme, Chris D.
    Yamagata, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2017, 198 (02) : 209 - 230
  • [33] Linking Outcomes From Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Forms Using Item Response Models
    Hoffman, Lesa
    Templin, Jonathan
    Rice, Mabel L.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2012, 55 (03): : 754 - 763
  • [34] The Validation of a Basic Knowledge Test of Music for the Cultural Arts Guidance Program (PBSB) in Malaysia Using the 2 Parameter Logistic (2PL) Model Item Response Theory
    Mokshein, Siti Eshah
    Saidon, Zaharul Lailiddin
    Doig, Brian
    MALAYSIAN MUSIC JOURNAL, 2016, 5 (01): : 20 - 36
  • [35] A RMT-based LM test for error cross-sectional independence in large heterogeneous panel data models
    Bailey, Natalia
    Jiang, Dandan
    Yao, Jianfeng
    ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2022, 41 (05) : 564 - 582