Learning About Computers: An Analysis of Information Search and Technology Choice

被引:0
|
作者
Tülin Erdem
Michael P. Keane
T. Sabri Öncü
Judi Strebel
机构
[1] University of California,Haas School of Business
[2] Berkeley,Department of Economics
[3] Yale University,Graduate School of Business
[4] Stanford University,College of Business
[5] San Francisco State University,undefined
来源
Quantitative Marketing and Economics | 2005年 / 3卷
关键词
brand choice models; technology choice; decision-making under uncertainty; information search; consumer expectations; dynamic programming;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We estimate a dynamic model of how consumers learn about and choose between different brands of personal computers (PCs). To estimate the model, we use a panel data set that contains the search and purchase behavior of a set of consumers who were in the market for a PC. The data includes the information sources visited each period, search durations, as well as measures of price expectations and stated attitudes toward the alternatives during the search process. Our model extends recent work on estimation of Bayesian learning models of consumer choice behavior in environments characterized by uncertainty by estimating a model of active learning—i.e., a model in which consumers make optimal sequential decisions about how much information to gather prior to making a purchase. Also, following the suggestion of Manski (2003), we use our data on price expectations to model consumers’ price expectation process, and, following the suggestion of McFadden (1989a), we incorporate the stated brand quality information into our likelihood function, rather than modeling only revealed preference data.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 247
页数:40
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [41] A Comparative Analysis of the Categorization of Multidimensional Stimuli: II. Strategic Information Search in Humans (Homo sapiens) but Not in Pigeons (Columba livia)
    Lea, Stephen E. G.
    Wills, Andy J.
    Leaver, Lisa A.
    Ryan, Catriona M. E.
    Bryant, Catherine M. L.
    Millar, Louise
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 123 (04) : 406 - 420