Experiential Wellbeing Data from the American Time Use Survey: Comparisons with Other Methods and Analytic Illustrations with Age and Income

被引:0
作者
Arthur A. Stone
Stefan Schneider
Alan Krueger
Joseph E. Schwartz
Angus Deaton
机构
[1] University of Southern California,Dornsife Center for Self
[2] University of Southern California,Report Science and the Department of Psychology
[3] Princeton University,Dornsife Center for Self
[4] Stony Brook University,Report Science, Center for Economic and Social Research
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2018年 / 136卷
关键词
Daily measurement; Evaluative wellbeing; Experiential wellbeing; Time use;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There has been a recent upsurge of interest in self-reported measures of wellbeing by official statisticians and by researchers in the social sciences. This paper considers data from a wellbeing supplement to the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), which parsed the previous day into episodes. Respondents provided ratings of five experiential wellbeing adjectives (happiness, stress, tiredness, sadness, and pain) for each of three randomly selected episodes. Because the ATUS wellbeing module has not received very much attention, in this paper we provide the reader with details about the features of these data and our approach to analyzing the data (e.g., weighting considerations), and then illustrate the applicability of these data to current issues. Specifically, we examine the association of age and income with all of the experiential wellbeing adjective in the ATUS. Results from the ATUS wellbeing module were broadly consistent with earlier findings on age, but did not confirm all earlier findings between income and wellbeing. We conclude that the ATUS, with its measurement of time use, specific activities, and hedonic experience in a nationally representative survey, offers a unique opportunity to incorporate time use into the burgeoning field of wellbeing research.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 378
页数:19
相关论文
共 132 条
  • [1] Baltes PB(2003)Extending longevity: Dignity gain-or dignity drain? MaxPlanck Research 3 14-19
  • [2] Baum A(1999)Socioeconomic status and chronic stress: Does stress account for SES effects on health? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 896 131-144
  • [3] Garofalo J(1935)The curve of life as studied in biographies Journal of Applied Psychology 19 405-409
  • [4] Yali A(2003)Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life Motivation and Emotion 27 103-123
  • [5] Bühler C(2000)Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 644-655
  • [6] Carstensen LL(2011)Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling Psychology and Aging 26 21-33
  • [7] Fung HH(2014)Validation of a brief yesterday measure of hedonic well-being and daily activities: Comparison with the day reconstruction method Social Indicators Research 115 907-917
  • [8] Charles ST(2008)Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles Journal of Economic Literature 46 95-144
  • [9] Carstensen LL(2009)Economic satisfaction and income rank in small neighbourhoods Journal of the European Economic Association 7 519-527
  • [10] Pasupathi M(1992)Psychological stress and the common cold New England Journal of Medicine 326 645-646