Economic impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in Turkey: analysis of vulnerability and resilience of regions and diversely affected economic sectors

被引:0
作者
Suat Tuysuz
Tüzin Baycan
Fatih Altuğ
机构
[1] Erzincan Binali Yildirim University,Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts and Science
[2] İstanbul Technical University,Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture
[3] Ondokuz Mayıs University,Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts and Science
来源
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science | 2022年 / 6卷
关键词
COVID-19; Economy; Regional resilience; Regional vulnerability; Turkey; O1; O4;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The COVID-19 outbreak has deeply affected the global economy of most countries and Turkey is no exception. However, the impacts of the outbreak differ on a regional basis, and both scientists and policymakers have neglected this regional differentiation. In an attempt to redress this situation, our study aimed to reveal the regional disparities related to the economic impacts of the outbreak and the dynamics that created this differentiation in Turkey. Our statistical analyses were carried out based on two different periods. The first period covered the first trimester when the outbreak began, and several shutdowns were implemented. The second period covered the second trimester when society began to open up again. The first trimester was termed the shock period, and the second trimester the recovery period. We developed a resilient–vulnerability index based on selected variables such as employment, energy consumption, exports, and the number of companies established and closed using a location quotient (LQ) analysis. While our index offers a picture of resilient and vulnerable regions, we also used this index as a dependent variable in our study. In the second stage, we focused on what kinds of dynamics gave rise to the resilience or vulnerability of a region. Our findings revealed that regions are economically affected by the outbreak at different levels. The regression analysis results showed that the innovation capacity and export levels of the regions predict regional resilience negatively, while firm size predicts positively. The recovery of regions also differed regionally. Our analyses show that Turkish regions with relatively larger economies recover more slowly, while regions with smaller economies recover more quickly.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1158
页数:25
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Bailey D(2021)Regions in COVID-19 recovery Reg Stud 55 1955-1965
[2]  
Crescenzi R(2013)Challenges of transformation: ınnovation, re-bundling and traditional manufacturing in Canada’s technology triangle Reg Stud 47 1111-1130
[3]  
Roller E(2022)Resilience to health shocks and the spatial extent of local labour markets: evidence from the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy Reg Stud 49 733-751
[4]  
Anguelovski I(2015)Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience Reg Stud 37 229-247
[5]  
Datta A(2009)Economic vulnerability and resilience: concepts and measurements Oxf Dev Stud 111 275-287
[6]  
Harrison J(2020)From corona virus to corona crisis: the value of an analytical and geographical understanding of crisis Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 98 755-778
[7]  
Bathelt H(2019)Industrial relatedness and regional resilience in the European Union Pap Reg Sci 62 657-680
[8]  
Munro AK(2019)Does related variety affect regional resilience? New evidence from Italy Ann Reg Sci 3 85-104
[9]  
Spigel B(2010)The resilient regional labour market? The US case Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3 3-10
[10]  
Borsati M(2010)Regional resilience: theoretical and empirical perspectives Camb J Reg Econ Soc 3 121-137