Comparison of INAA and RNAA Methods with Thermal-Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Iridium Determinations in Atmospheric Tracer Studies

被引:0
作者
S. F. Heller-Zeisler
P. V. Borgoul
R. R. Moore
M. Smoliar
A. E. Suarez
J. M. Ondov
机构
[1] University of Maryland,Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
[2] University of Maryland,Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
来源
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry | 2000年 / 244卷
关键词
Physical Chemistry; Mass Spectrometry; Inorganic Chemistry; Neutron Activation Analysis; INAA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The sensitivity and precision of instrumental neutron activation analysis (NAA), radiochemical neutron activation analysis (RNAA), and thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) are compared for the determination of Ir in ambient size-fractionated aerosol particulate samples. The results of the TIMS analyses indicated high analytical precision (0.2% at >50 pg Ir), but the sensitivity of detection was limited by blank values (300–500 fg). The sensitivities for INAA and RNAA were comparable, i.e., 60 to 90 fg in size-segregated particulate samples.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 96
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Suarez A. E.(1998)undefined Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 1522-undefined
[2]  
Caffrey P. F.(1998)undefined Atmos. Env. 32 1911-undefined
[3]  
Borgoul P. V.(1997)undefined Anal. Chem. 69 2444-undefined
[4]  
Ondov J. M.(1998)undefined J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 233 155-undefined
[5]  
Wu C. C.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[6]  
Suarez A. E.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[7]  
Lin Z.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Kidwell C. B.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Borgoul P. V.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Caffrey P. F.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined