Evaluation of a prospective surgical strategy of extended resection to achieve R0 status in gall bladder cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Pottakkat B. [1 ]
Kapoor A. [1 ]
Prakash A. [1 ]
Singh R.K. [1 ]
Behari A. [1 ]
Kumar A. [1 ]
Kapoor V.K. [1 ]
Saxena R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014 UP, Rae Bareli Road
关键词
Cancer; Carcinoma; Gall bladder; Survival;
D O I
10.1007/s12029-012-9432-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Radical resection to achieve R0 status remains the only potential curative option in patients with gall bladder cancer (GBC). This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an extended criterion of radical resection to achieve R0 status in GBC. Methods: A triple-phase CT with 3D reconstruction was done in all patients. A standard resectability criterion was followed in all patients. A minimum of liver segment 4B + 5 resection and radical lymphadenectomy including the para-aortic areas were undertaken in all patients. Adjacent organectomy was added as required. Results: Between November 2008 and April 2011, 59 patients with GBC underwent operation and 40 (resectability, 68 %) underwent resection. The resectional procedures performed were segmentectomy 4B + 5 in 31 (78 %), median sectorectomy in 2 (5 %), extended right hepatectomy in 3 (8 %), and hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy in 4 (10 %) patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 24 (60 %) patients. Two patients died postoperatively. A total of 829 lymph nodes were harvested and the median lymph node count was 18 (4-77). Twenty-three (58 %) patients had lymph node metastases. Twenty-eight of 40 (70 %) had disease limited till N1 nodes. Metastases up to N2 lymph nodes were seen in 12 (30 %). American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition stages were I - 2 (5 %) patients, II - 5 (13 %), III - 19 (48 %), and IV - 14 (35 %). R0 resection was achieved in 33 (83 %) patients. Four patients had recurrence and one died of recurrence. All other patients are alive till the last follow-up. Conclusions: Assessment with triple-phase CT with 3D reconstruction can produce high resectability rate in GBC. Extended criterion of radical resection results in R0 status in more than 80 % of patients with GBC. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low Expectancy of Conversion Surgery with R0 Resection in Patients with CEA > 5.0 ng/mL at the Initial RECIST Evaluation for Metastatic Gastric Cancer
    Nakanishi, Koki
    Tanaka, Chie
    Kanda, Mitsuro
    Miyata, Kazushi
    Furukawa, Kazuhiro
    Maeda, Osamu
    Shimizu, Dai
    Sugita, Shizuki
    Kakushima, Naomi
    Furune, Satoshi
    Kawashima, Hiroki
    Ando, Yuichi
    Ebata, Tomoki
    Kodera, Yasuhiro
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (21)
  • [32] Evaluating and validating the predictive ability of preoperative systemic inflammatory/immune cells in gastric cancer following R0 resection
    Xue, Wenbo
    Xu, Xuezhong
    Tan, Yulin
    Qian, Yan
    Wang, Hao
    Wang, Yibo
    Xu, Yixin
    Zhu, Xiaojun
    Jiang, Peng
    Ding, Wei
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 18 (05) : 5205 - 5214
  • [33] Comparison of Gastric Cancer Survival Following R0 Resection in the United States and Korea Using an Internationally Validated Nomogram
    Strong, Vivian E.
    Song, Kyo Young
    Park, Cho Hyun
    Jacks, Lindsay M.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Shah, Manish
    Coit, Daniel G.
    Brennan, Murray F.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (04) : 640 - 646
  • [34] Commentary: Patient frailty also drives long-term outcomes after R0 resection for lung cancer
    Zambetti, Benjamin R.
    Ng, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 161 (03) : 787 - 788
  • [35] Survival in Lymph Node Negative Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus after R0 Resection With and Without Neoadjuvant Therapy: Evidence for Downstaging of N Status
    Leers, Jessica M.
    Ayazi, Shahin
    Hagen, Jeffrey A.
    Terterov, Sergei
    Klipfel, Nancy
    Oezcelik, Arzu
    Abate, Emmanuele
    Lipham, John C.
    DeMeester, Steven R.
    Banki, Farzaneh
    DeMeester, Tom R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 208 (04) : 553 - 556
  • [36] Survival Outcomes of Optimally Treated Colorectal Metastases: The Importance of R0 Status in Surgical Treatment of Hepatic and Peritoneal Surface Disease
    Solsky, Ian
    Moaven, Omeed
    Valenzuela, Cristian D. D.
    Lundy, Megan
    Stauffer, John A. A.
    Del Piccolo, Nico R. R.
    Cheung, Tanto
    Corvera, Carlos U. U.
    Wisneski, Andrew D. D.
    Cha, Charles
    Zarandi, Nima Pourhabibi
    Dourado, Justin
    Russell, Gregory
    Levine, Edward A. A.
    Votanopoulos, Konstantinos L. I.
    Shen, Perry
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (7) : 4264 - 4273
  • [37] Potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in T2N0 gastric cancer after radical resection without residual disease (R0)
    Liu, Donghui
    Wang, Xuyao
    Hu, Xiaowei
    Wang, Jincai
    Li, Long
    Jiang, Qingqin
    Wu, Jin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (10): : 11009 - 11015
  • [38] Lymph Node Ratio Predicts Recurrence and Survival After R0 Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Taylor, Matthew D.
    LaPar, Damien J.
    Thomas, Christopher J.
    Persinger, Matthew
    Stelow, Edward B.
    Kozower, Benjamin D.
    Lau, Christine L.
    Jones, David R.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 96 (04) : 1163 - 1170
  • [39] R0 Resection for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer with Low-dose Gemcitabine with Wide Irradiation Area as Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Kamachi, Hirofumi
    Tsuruga, Yousuke
    Orimo, Tatsuya
    Wakayama, Kenji
    Shimada, Shingo
    Nagatsu, Akihisa
    Yokoo, Hideki
    Kamiyama, Toshiya
    Katoh, Norio
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    IN VIVO, 2018, 32 (05): : 1183 - 1191
  • [40] Positive lymph node ratio is an index in predicting prognosis for remnant gastric cancer with insufficient retrieved lymph node in R0 resection
    Wang, Honghu
    Qi, Hao
    Liu, Xiaofang
    Gao, Ziming
    Hidasa, Iko
    Aikebaier, Ailixier
    Li, Kai
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)