A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers' behavior?

被引:19
作者
Feder L. [1 ]
Wilson D.B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Division of Administration of Justice, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207-4015
[2] George Mason University, MS 4F4, Manassas, VA 20110-2203
关键词
Batterer intervention; Domestic violence; Intimate partner violence; Meta-analysis; Recidivism;
D O I
10.1007/s11292-005-1179-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Court-mandated batterer intervention programs are being implemented throughout the United States to address the problem of domestic violence. Prior reviews of research on the effectiveness of these programs have arrived at conflicting conclusions. This study is a systematic review of the extant research on this topic. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies that used matching or statistical controls were included. The results were mixed. The mean effect for official reports of domestic violence from experimental studies showed modest benefit, whereas the mean effect for victim reported outcomes was zero. Quasi-experimental studies using a no-treatment comparison had inconsistent findings indicating an overall small harmful effect. In contract, quasi-experimental studies using a treatment dropout design showed a large, positive mean effect on domestic violence outcomes. We discuss the weakness of the latter design and raise concerns regarding official reports. The findings, we believe, raise doubts about the effectiveness of court-mandated batterer intervention programs. © Springer 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 262
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Adams D., McCormick A., Men unlearning violence: A group approach based on the collective model, The Abusive Partner: An Analysis of Domestic Battering, pp. 170-197, (1982)
[2]  
Babcock J.C., Taillade J., Evaluating interventions for men who batter, Domestic Violence: Guidelines for Research-informed Practice, pp. 37-77, (2000)
[3]  
Babcock J.C., Green C.E., Robie C., Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment, Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 8, pp. 1023-1053, (2004)
[4]  
Berk R., Boruch T., Chambers F., Rossi P., Witte S., Social policy experimentation: A position paper, Evaluation Review, 9, 4, pp. 387-429, (1985)
[5]  
Berk R., Campbell A., Klap R., Western B., The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments, American Sociological Review, 57, 5, pp. 698-708, (1992)
[6]  
Brisson N., Battering husbands: A survey of abusive men, Victimology, 6, pp. 338-344, (1981)
[7]  
Chalk R., King P., Violence in Families: Assessing Prevention and Treatment Programs, (1998)
[8]  
Chen H., Bersani C., Myers S., Denton R., Evaluating the effectiveness of a court sponsored treatment program, Journal of Family Violence, 4, pp. 309-322, (1989)
[9]  
Cook T.D., Campbell D.T., Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, (1979)
[10]  
Cromwell N., Burgess A., Understanding Violence Against Women, (1996)