Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem

被引:0
作者
S. M. Hauptmann
P. Weber
C. Glaser
C. Birkenmaier
V. Jansson
P. E. Müller
机构
[1] Grosshadern Medical Center,Department of Orthopedics
[2] Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich,Department of Radiology
[3] Grosshadern Medical Center,undefined
[4] Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich,undefined
来源
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | 2008年 / 16卷
关键词
Knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental; Minimally invasive; Bone cement; Complications; Arthroscopy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The minimally invasive implantation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) leads to excellent functional results, but due to the reduced intraoperative visibility the removal of excessive cement may be difficult. In a retrospective study we assessed radiologically the incidence of loose and excess bone cement in 120 UKAs and correlated it to the thickness of the tibial cement layer. In 25 cases loose or attached excess cement was seen. Two of these patients with loose cement bodies required revision surgery. An additional 2 patients not operated at our institution required revision because of pain and loss of motion. The average thickness of the tibial cement layer was 3.1 (1.7–5.0) mm in all the patients. But it was significantly higher in the group with excess cement bodies [3.3 (2.3–5.0) mm] compared to the group without excess cement [3.0 (1.7–4.1) mm] (P < 0.05). Symptomatic free cement bodies need to be removed immediately, if necessary arthroscopically, in order to avoid damage to the implants. To avoid this problem in minimally invasive UKA, intraoperative fluoroscopy, a dental mirror or a nerve hook seem to be useful tools to identify and remove loose or excess cement.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 775
页数:5
相关论文
共 133 条
  • [1] Ackroyd CE(2002)A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 667-672
  • [2] Whitehouse SL(1968)Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee Arthritis Rheum 11 705-733
  • [3] Newman JH(2004)Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the “Oxford Uni” meniscal bearing knee Orthopade 33 1277-1283
  • [4] Joslin CC(1986)The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am 68 1041-1051
  • [5] Ahlback S(2004)Clinical outcomes in the revision of unicondylar arthoplasties to bicondylar arthroplasties. A matched-pair study Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124 702-707
  • [6] Bauer GC(1999)Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup Clin Orthop Relat Res 367 50-60
  • [7] Bohne WH(1998)Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem in cemented total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 356 73-78
  • [8] Aldinger PR(2002)Gait anlysis in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee before and after total knee replacement Zentralbl Chir 127 868-872
  • [9] Clarius M(1991)Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 356 125-134
  • [10] Murray DW(1986)Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5–10 years’ follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Br 68 447-452