Hello, goodbye: When do states withdraw from international organizations?

被引:0
作者
Inken von Borzyskowski
Felicity Vabulas
机构
[1] Florida State University,
[2] Pepperdine University,undefined
来源
The Review of International Organizations | 2019年 / 14卷
关键词
International organizations; Withdrawal; International institutions; Exit; Nationalism; Liberal order; Compliance; International law;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Under what conditions do states withdraw from intergovernmental organizations (IGOs)? Recent events such as Brexit, the US withdrawal from UNESCO, and US threats to withdraw from NAFTA, NATO, and the World Trade Organization have triggered widespread concern because they appear to signify a backlash against international organizations. Some observers attribute this recent surge to increasing nationalism. But does this explanation hold up as a more general explanation for IGO withdrawals across time and space? Despite many studies of why states join IGOs, we know surprisingly little about when and why states exit IGOs. We use research on IGO accession to derive potential explanations for IGO withdrawal related to domestic politics, IGO characteristics, and geo-politics. We quantitatively test these potential explanations for withdrawal using an original dataset of 493 IGOs since 1945, documenting about 200 cases of withdrawal. We find that nationalism is not the key driver of IGO withdrawals in the past. Instead, we show that geo-political factors – such as preference divergence and contagion – are the main factors linked to IGO withdrawals, followed by democracy levels in the country and organization. These findings have important implications for research on the vitality of international organizations, compliance, and the liberal world order.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 366
页数:31
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [21] Chayes A(2005)Exiting treaties Virginia Law Review 91 1579-466
  • [22] Chayes A(2006)Not fully committed-reservations, risk, and treaty design Yale Journal of International Law 31 367-287
  • [23] Davis CL(1982)European economic community: The right of member state withdrawal, the. Ga Journal of International and Comparative Law 12 335-484
  • [24] Wilf M(1992)Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the almond-Lippmann consensus International Studies Quarterly 36 439-129
  • [25] Donno D(2018)The political and economic consequences of populist rule Government and Opposition. 53 256-24
  • [26] Donno D(2017)Mind the gap! Populism, participation and representation in Europe Swiss Political Science Review 23 462-23
  • [27] Metzger SK(2016)A drunken guest in Europe? The influence of populist radical right parties on democratic quality Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 10 103-418
  • [28] Russett B(2012)Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching Political Analysis 20 1-109
  • [29] Downs GW(2018)The end of liberal international order? International Affairs 94 7-249
  • [30] Rocke DM(2016)Not letting ‘bad apples’ spoil the bunch: Democratization and strict international organization accession rules Review of International Organization 11 399-163