Preoperative Education for Hip and Knee Replacement: Never Stop Learning

被引：94

作者：

Edwards P.K. ^{[1
]}

Mears S.C. ^{[1
]}

Lowry Barnes C. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Slot 531, Little Rock, 72205, AR

来源：

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2017年 / 10卷 / 3期

关键词：

Alternative payment model; Bundled payment; Discharge disposition; Hip replacement; Hospital readmissions; Knee replacement;

D O I：

10.1007/s12178-017-9417-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose of review: Participation in alternative payment models has focused efforts to improve outcomes and patient satisfaction while also lowering cost for elective hip and knee replacement. The purpose of this review is to determine if preoperative education classes for elective hip and knee replacement achieve these goals. Recent findings: Recent literature demonstrates that patients who attend education classes prior to surgery have decreased anxiety, better post-operative pain control, more realistic expectations of surgery, and a better understanding of their surgery. As a result, comprehensive clinical pathways incorporating a preoperative education program for elective hip and knee replacement lead to lower hospital length of stay, higher home discharge, lower readmission, and improved cost. Summary: In summary, we report convincing evidence that preoperative education classes are an essential element to successful participation in alternative payment models such as the Bundle Payment Care Initiative. © 2017, The Author(s).

引用

页码：356 / 364

页数：8

共 109 条

[1]

Dobson A., DaVanzo J., Heath S., Medicare Payment Bundling: Insights from Claims Data and Policy Implications: Analyses of Episode-based Payment, (2012)

[2]

Mabrey J.D., Toohey J.S., Armstrong D.A., Et al., Clinical pathway management of total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 345, (1997)

[3]

Bini S.A., Fithian D.C., Paxton L.W., Et al., Does discharge disposition after primary total joint arthroplasty affect readmission rates?, J Arthroplast, 25, 1, (2010)

[4]

Ramos N.L., Karia R.J., Hutzler L.H., Et al., The effect of discharge disposition on 30-day re- admission rates after total joint arthroplasty, J Arthroplast, 29, 4, (2014)

[5]

Miller D.C., Gust C., Dimick J.B., Et al., Large variations in Medicare payments for surgery highlight savings potential from bundled payment programs, Health Aff (Millwood), 30, 11, (2011)

[6]

Edwards P.K., Mears S.C., Barnes C.L., BPCI: Everyone Wins, Including the Patient. Journal of Arthroplasty. In Press Accepted Manuscript. Published online: February, 28, (2017)

[7]

Edwards P.K., Levine M., Cullinan K., Newbern G., Barnes C.L., Avoiding readmissions-support systems required after discharge to continue rapid recovery?, J Arthroplasty, 30, 4, pp. 527-530, (2015)

[8]

Edwards P.K., Barnes C.L., Dealing with the outliers—Physicians, inpatient post-acute care providers, physical therapists, and visiting nursing facilities, Seminars in Arthroplasty, 27, 3, (2016)

[9]

Althausen P.L., Mead L., Bundled Payments for Care Improvement: Lessons Learned in the First Year, J Orthop Trauma, 30, pp. S50-S53, (2016)

[10]

Iorio R., Bosco J., Slover J., Sayeed Y., Zuckerman J.D., Single Institution Early Experience with the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 99, 1, (2017)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →