Globalization, State Formation, and Reinvention in Public Governance: Exploring the Linkages and Patterns in Southeast Asia

被引:0
作者
Haque M.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Political Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Globalization; Governance; Neoliberal Reform; Southeast Asia; State;
D O I
10.1007/s11115-013-0258-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While the existing studies on globalization widely cover the realms of economy, politics, society, and culture, the discourse is hardly extended to the domain of public governance. Although there are studies on the globalization or cross-national convergence of contemporary neoliberal models of governance - that is, the New Public Management (NPM) model and its revisionist post-NPM alternatives - there is a relative lack of research on how the globalization phenomenon itself has been a major cause of the emergence of such a neoliberal public sector management. In explaining the main causes of these neoliberal reinventions, most scholars highlight issues like fiscal crisis, state failure, and public sector inefficiency. They rarely consider how the dominant actors of globalization may constitute a major force causing the recent neoliberal transformation of the state and market-led reinvention in state policies and management. This article explicates these linkages - between globalization, state formation, and public sector reform - with specific reference to Southeast Asia. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 396
页数:15
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Governance in Thailand: Challenges, Issues and Prospects, (1999)
[2]  
Atreya B., Armstrong A., Evaluation of the Applicability of NPM Reforms to Developing Countries: A Case from Nepal. Working Paper No.17/2002, School of Management, (2002)
[3]  
Beeson M., Globalization, governance, and the political-economy of public policy reform in East Asia, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 14, 4, pp. 481-502, (2001)
[4]  
Bertucci G., Jemiai Y., Public Sector Reform Revisited in the Context of Globalization, (2000)
[5]  
Cheung A.B., The politics of administrative reforms in Asia: paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities, Governance, 18, 2, pp. 257-282, (2005)
[6]  
Chittoo H.B., Ramphul N., Nowbutsing B., Globalization and public sector reforms in a developing country, Culture Mandala: Bulletin of the Centre for East-West Cultural & Economic Studies, 8, 2, pp. 30-51, (2009)
[7]  
Coclanis P.A., Doshi T., Globalization in Southeast Asia, Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 570, pp. 49-64, (2000)
[8]  
Dent C., Transnational capital, the state and foreign economic policy: Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan, Review of International Political Economy, 10, 2, pp. 246-277, (2003)
[9]  
Doner R.F., Ritchie B.K., Slater D., Systemic vulnerability and the origins of developmental states: Northeast and Southeast Asia in comparative perspective, International Organization, 59, 2, pp. 327-361, (2005)
[10]  
Farazmand A., Globalization and public administration, Public Administration Review, 59, 6, pp. 509-522, (1999)