Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping

被引:0
作者
Dean R. Melmoth
Simon Grant
机构
[1] City University,Department of Optometry and Visual Science, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Visual Sciences
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2006年 / 171卷
关键词
Monocular vision; Stereopsis; Prehension; Visuomotor behaviour; Human;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Theoretical considerations suggest that binocular information should provide advantages, compared to monocular viewing, for the planning and execution of natural reaching and grasping actions, but empirical support for this is quite equivocal. We have examined these predictions on a simple prehension task in which normal subjects reached, grasped and lifted isolated cylindrical household objects (two sizes, four locations) in a well-lit environment, using binocular vision or with one eye occluded. Various kinematic measures reflecting the programming and on-line control of the movements were quantified, in combination with analyses of different types of error occurring in the velocity, spatial path and grip aperture profiles of each trial. There was little consistent effect of viewing condition on the early phase of the reach, up to and including the peak deceleration, but all other aspects of performance were superior under binocular control. Subjects adopted a cautious approach when binocular information was unavailable: they extended the end phase of the reach and pre-shaped their hand with a wider grip aperture further away from the object. Despite these precautions, initial grip application was poorly coordinated with target contact and was inaccurately scaled to the objects’ dimensions, with the subsequent post-contact phase of the grasp significantly more prolonged, error-prone and variable compared to binocular performance. These effects were obtained in two separate experiments in which the participants’ performed the task under randomized or more predictable (blocked) viewing conditions. Our data suggest that binocular vision offers particular advantages for controlling the terminal reach and the grasp. We argue that these benefits derive from binocular disparity processing linked to changes in relative hand–target distance, and that this depth information is independently used to regulate the progress of the approaching hand and to guide the digits to the (pre-selected) contact points on the object, thereby ensuring that the grip is securely applied.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 388
页数:17
相关论文
共 163 条
[21]  
Seitz RJ(2003)Optic atxia as a deficit specific to the on-line control of actions Neurosci Behav Rev 27 447-456
[22]  
Freund H-J(1997)A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular, and memory-guided viewing conditions Visl Cog 4 113-142
[23]  
Bootsma RJ(2002)Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements Curr Biol 12 237-240
[24]  
Marteniuk RG(1991)Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension Exp Brain Res 86 199-208
[25]  
MacKenzie CL(1984)The timing of natural prehension movements J Mot Behav 16 235-254
[26]  
Zaal FTJM(1995)Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation Trends Neurosci 18 314-320
[27]  
Bradshaw MF(1997)Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces J Neurosci 17 4486-4499
[28]  
Elliot KM(1984)Roles of glaborous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects Exp Brain Res 56 550-564
[29]  
Bradshaw MF(1997)An analysis of spatiotemporal variability during prehension movements: effects of object size and distance Exp Brain Res 117 457-464
[30]  
Parton AD(2004)When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance Exp Brain Res 158 317-327