Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping

被引:0
作者
Dean R. Melmoth
Simon Grant
机构
[1] City University,Department of Optometry and Visual Science, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Visual Sciences
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2006年 / 171卷
关键词
Monocular vision; Stereopsis; Prehension; Visuomotor behaviour; Human;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Theoretical considerations suggest that binocular information should provide advantages, compared to monocular viewing, for the planning and execution of natural reaching and grasping actions, but empirical support for this is quite equivocal. We have examined these predictions on a simple prehension task in which normal subjects reached, grasped and lifted isolated cylindrical household objects (two sizes, four locations) in a well-lit environment, using binocular vision or with one eye occluded. Various kinematic measures reflecting the programming and on-line control of the movements were quantified, in combination with analyses of different types of error occurring in the velocity, spatial path and grip aperture profiles of each trial. There was little consistent effect of viewing condition on the early phase of the reach, up to and including the peak deceleration, but all other aspects of performance were superior under binocular control. Subjects adopted a cautious approach when binocular information was unavailable: they extended the end phase of the reach and pre-shaped their hand with a wider grip aperture further away from the object. Despite these precautions, initial grip application was poorly coordinated with target contact and was inaccurately scaled to the objects’ dimensions, with the subsequent post-contact phase of the grasp significantly more prolonged, error-prone and variable compared to binocular performance. These effects were obtained in two separate experiments in which the participants’ performed the task under randomized or more predictable (blocked) viewing conditions. Our data suggest that binocular vision offers particular advantages for controlling the terminal reach and the grasp. We argue that these benefits derive from binocular disparity processing linked to changes in relative hand–target distance, and that this depth information is independently used to regulate the progress of the approaching hand and to guide the digits to the (pre-selected) contact points on the object, thereby ensuring that the grip is securely applied.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 388
页数:17
相关论文
共 163 条
  • [1] Berthier NE(1996)Visual information and object size in the control of reaching J Mot Behav 28 187-197
  • [2] Clifton RK(1998)The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception for reaching J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24 145-168
  • [3] Gullapalli V(2000)Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26 1436-1460
  • [4] McCall DD(2001)Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27 1314-1334
  • [5] Robin DJ(1998)Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension. A combined lesion and functional MRI activation study Neurology 50 1253-1259
  • [6] Bingham GP(1994)The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics Exp Brain Res 98 535-541
  • [7] Pagano CC(2003)The role of binocular information in the ‘on-line’ control of prehension Spat Vis 16 295-309
  • [8] Bingham GP(2000)The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information Vision Res 40 3725-3734
  • [9] Zaal F(2004)Binocular cues and the control of prehension Spat Vis 17 95-110
  • [10] Robin D(1998)Judging distance from ocular convergence Vision Res 38 493-498