How to get the optimal defibrillation lead parameters using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with coronary artery disease

被引:0
作者
Tariel A. Atabekov
Roman E. Batalov
Svetlana I. Sazonova
Sergey N. Krivolapov
Mikhail S. Khlynin
Anna I. Mishkina
Konstantin V. Zavadovsky
Antonio Curnis
Sergey V. Popov
机构
[1] Russian Academy of Sciences,Department of Surgical Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Centre
[2] Russian Academy of Sciences,Nuclear Medicine Department, Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Centre
[3] Università Degli Studi di Brescia,Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2021年 / 37卷
关键词
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy; Pacing threshold; Ventricle signal amplitude;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The conventional criteria for a defibrillation lead (DL) implantation don’t take into account presence of scar or deep ischemia in the myocardium. This may impair a proper functioning of the DL. We sought to optimize the DL implantation placement using rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), which allow detecting areas of myocardial hypoperfusion (MH). To study the influence of MH and scarring, detected by MPS, on the DL parameters in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). 69 patients (male—65, age 64.8 ± 7.7 years) with CAD and indications for ICD implantation were enrolled. Two days before ICD implantation all patients underwent MPS at rest. Then patients were divided in 2 groups. In the 1st group DL was implanted considering MPS results: to the septal position, if the most significant MH were detected in the apical segments, and to the apical position, if MH were in the septal segments. In the 2nd group DL was implanted using the conventional approach without considering MPS results. Clinical 12 months follow-up was performed with ICD interrogation. Patients of both groups were comparable by clinical and scintigraphic parameters. In the same time, in the 1st group pacing threshold was lower (p < 0.0001) and ventricle signal amplitude was higher (p < 0.0001) comparing with the 2nd group at all control points. The presence of MH detected by MPS in the area of the DL placement worsens its parameters. The results of MPS in patients with CAD can be useful for optimization of DL placement.
引用
收藏
页码:3323 / 3333
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Epstein AE(2013)2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities J Am Coll Cardiol 30 675-700
[2]  
DiMarco JP(2016)Tachycardia detection in modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 42 1929-1940
[3]  
Ellenbogen KA(2018)Single vs dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients without a bradycardia pacing indication: systematic review and meta-analysis Europace undefined undefined-undefined
[4]  
Bruggeman T(2014)A prospective randomized trial of single- or dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to minimize inappropriate shock risk in primary sudden cardiac death prevention Europace undefined undefined-undefined
[5]  
Dahlke D(2007)The dilemma of ICD implant testing Pacing Clin Electrophysiol undefined undefined-undefined
[6]  
Chebbo A(2016)2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing Europace undefined undefined-undefined
[7]  
Neumann I(2020)Atrial signal amplitude predicts atrial high-rate episodes in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: Insights from a large database of remote monitoring transmissions J Arrhythm undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Zeitler EP(2018)Endocardial infarct scar recognition by myocardial electrical impedance is not influenced by changes in cardiac activation sequence Heart Rhythm undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Sanders GD(2017)Near-field impedance accurately distinguishes among pericardial, intracavitary, and anterior mediastinal position J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Singh K(2012)Noise, artifact and oversensing related inappropriate ICD shock evaluation: ALTITUDE noise study Pacing Clin Electrophysiol undefined undefined-undefined