Sex estimation from the greater sciatic notch: a comparison of classical statistical models and machine learning algorithms

被引:0
作者
Siam Knecht
Luísa Nogueira
Maël Servant
Frédéric Santos
Véronique Alunni
Caroline Bernardi
Gérald Quatrehomme
机构
[1] Université de Lorraine,Faculté de Médecine
[2] Institut Universitaire d’Anthropologie Médico-Légale Université Côte d’Azur,Faculté de Médecine
[3] Université de Bordeaux,UMR 5199 PACEA
[4] Allée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire,undefined
[5] CEPAM,undefined
[6] UMR CNRS 7264,undefined
来源
International Journal of Legal Medicine | 2021年 / 135卷
关键词
Forensic anthropology; Sexual dimorphism; Sex estimation; Greater sciatic notch; Statistical models; Machine learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The greater sciatic notch (GSN) is a useful element for sex estimation because it is quite resistant to damage, and thus it can often be assessed even in poorly preserved skeletons. This study aimed to develop statistical models for sex estimation based on visual and metric analyses of the GSN, and additional variables linked to the GSN. A total of 60 left coxal bones (30 males and 30 females) were analysed. Fifteen variables were measured, and one was a morphologic variable. These 16 variables were used for the comparison of six statistical models: linear discriminant analysis (LDA), regularized discriminant analysis (RDA), penalized logistic regression (PLR) and flexible discriminant analysis (FDA), and two machine learning algorithms, support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN). The statistical models were built in two steps: firstly, only with the GSN variables (group 1), and secondly, with the whole variables (group 2), in order to see if the models including all the variables performed better. The overall accuracy of the models was very close, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 using specific GSN variables. When additional variables starting from the deepest point of GSN are available, it is worth to use them, because the accuracy increases. PLR (after optimization of parameters) stands out from other statistical models. The position of the deepest point of GSN (Fig. 2) probably plays a crucial role for the sexual dimorphism, as stated by the good performance of the visual assessment of this point and the fact that the A2 angle (posterior angle with the deepest point of the GSN as the apex) is included in all models.
引用
收藏
页码:2603 / 2613
页数:10
相关论文
共 162 条
  • [1] Moraitis K(2013)Fracture characteristics of perimortem trauma in skeletal material Internet j biol Anthropol 3 1-8
  • [2] Eliopoulos C(2002)Application of osteology to forensic medicine Clin Anat 15 297-312
  • [3] Spilioupoulou C(2005)The reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans Forensic Sci Int 147 159-164
  • [4] Scheuer L(2011)Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements J Forensic Sci 56 289-296
  • [5] Đurić M(1979)Recommandations pour déterminer l’âge et le sexe sur le squelette Bull Mem Soc Anthropol Paris 6 7-45
  • [6] Rakočević Z(2019)The accuracy of 3D virtual bone models of the pelvis for morphological sex estimation Int J Legal Med 133 1853-1860
  • [7] Đonić D(2005)Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age, and population differences Am J Phys Anthropol 127 385-391
  • [8] Spradley MK(2015)Sex prediction from the femur and hip bone using a sample of CT images from a Spanish population Int J Legal Med 129 373-383
  • [9] Jantz RL(2016)A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework Forensic Sci Int 261 165.e1-165.e8
  • [10] Ferembach D(2014)Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population Int J Legal Med 28 861-872