The End of the Later Stone Age in the Middle Limpopo Valley, Central Southern Africa

被引:0
作者
Tim Forssman
机构
[1] University of Mpumalanga,Cultural and Heritage Studies, School of Social Sciences
[2] University of Pretoria,Department of Anthropology, Archaeology and Development Studies
来源
Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology | / 6卷
关键词
Later Stone Age; Foragers; Stone tools; Wilton Industry; Middle Limpopo Valley; Southern Africa;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Later Stone Age industries are often applied pan-regionally despite having been defined in specific environments that possess their own set of underlying conditions. Archaeologists have expressed concern with this approach as it may generate an appearance of homogeneity when in fact technological industries are variable. This study examines the middle Limpopo Valley’s mid- to late Holocene Later Stone Age cultural sequence and compares its various attributes to more broadly defined Later Stone Age industries from that period. Specific attention is given to the formal tool and core components as these are typically used to ascribe industries to assemblages along with chronology. Contrasting the valley’s Later Stone Age sequence with stone tool industries brings into question the influence that socio-economic systems had over stone tool producers and whether stone tool forms and preferences reflect social change. The middle Limpopo Valley is ideally suited for such an assessment as it was here that southern Africa’s earliest state-level society arose, Mapungubwe at c. AD 1220, several centuries after farmer groups settled the region. During these developments, stone tool-producing foragers were present, and they interacted with farmer groups in several ways. However, the analysis presented here fails to identify confidently regular change in forager stone tool assemblages linked to social developments and shows reasonable alignment with stone tool industry definitions. Examining change in late Holocene society of this landscape, and perhaps others, may need to consider a variety of cultural indicators in combination with stone tools.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]  
Antonites A(2016)The mobilities turn and archaeology: New perspectives on socio-political complexity in thirteenth-century northern South Africa Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 51 469-488
[2]  
Ashley CZ(2016)Technological, functional and contextual aspects of the K2 and Mapungubwe worked bone industries African Archaeological Review 33 437-463
[3]  
Antonites AR(1992)Let's walk before we run: An appraisal of historical materialist approaches to the Later Stone Age South African Archaeological Bulletin 47 44-51
[4]  
Bradfield J(2005)Coping with risk: Later Stone Age technological strategies at Blydefontein Rock Shelter, South Africa Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24 193-226
[5]  
Forssman T(2019)Identifying the animal species used to manufacture bone arrowheads in South Africa Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11 2419-2434
[6]  
Barham L(2003)Gosho I Shelter: Observations into the lithic complexities of the Pfupi Industry in northeastern Zimbabwe Southern African Humanities 15 1-43
[7]  
Bousman CB(2006)Mapungubwe: An historical and contemporary analysis of a World Heritage cultural landscape Koedoe 49 1-13
[8]  
Bradfield J(2014)Land and sea links: 1500 years of connectivity between southern Africa and the Indian Ocean rim regions, AD 700 to 1700 African Archaeological Review 31 705-724
[9]  
Forssman T(2013)New pathways of sociopolitical complexity in southern Africa African Archaeological Review 30 339-366
[10]  
Spindler L(2014)Zimbabwe culture before Mapungubwe: New evidence from Mapela Hill, south-western Zimbabwe PLoS ONE 9 e111224-201