The ethical use of artificial intelligence in human resource management: a decision-making framework

被引:0
作者
Sarah Bankins
机构
[1] Macquarie University,Macquarie Business School
来源
Ethics and Information Technology | 2021年 / 23卷
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Human resource management; Ethical AI; HRM and technology; Ethical task-technology fit; Human control;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly inputting into various human resource management (HRM) functions, such as sourcing job applicants and selecting staff, allocating work, and offering personalized career coaching. While the use of AI for such tasks can offer many benefits, evidence suggests that without careful and deliberate implementation its use also has the potential to generate significant harms. This raises several ethical concerns regarding the appropriateness of AI deployment to domains such as HRM, which directly deal with managing sometimes sensitive aspects of individuals’ employment lifecycles. However, research at the intersection of HRM and technology continues to largely center on examining what AI can be used for, rather than focusing on the salient factors relevant to its ethical use and examining how to effectively engage human workers in its use. Conversely, the ethical AI literature offers excellent guiding principles for AI implementation broadly, but there remains much scope to explore how these principles can be enacted in specific contexts-of-use. By drawing on ethical AI and task-technology fit literature, this paper constructs a decision-making framework to support the ethical deployment of AI for HRM and guide determinations of the optimal mix of human and machine involvement for different HRM tasks. Doing so supports the deployment of AI for the betterment of work and workers and generates both scholarly and practical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 854
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
[11]  
Binns R(1995)The principlism debate: A critical overview The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 144 114-126
[12]  
boyd d(2004)Performance management: A model and research agenda Applied Psychology: An International Review 97 368-376
[13]  
Crawford K(2015)Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 10 30-43
[14]  
Braddock JH(2012)Too much sitting—A health hazard Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 28 689-707
[15]  
McPartland JM(2019)Autonomy in surgical robots and its meaningful human control Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 19 213-236
[16]  
Braithwaite V(2019)A unified framework of five principles for AI in society Harvard Data Science Review 30 99-120
[17]  
Carabantes M(2018)AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society Minds and Machines 8 58-77
[18]  
Davis RB(1995)Task-technology fit and individual performance MIS Quarterly 20 711-730
[19]  
den Hartog DN(2020)The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines Minds and Machines 61 577-586
[20]  
Boselie P(2006)Measuring leadership effectiveness in complex socio-technical systems Emergence: Complexity and Organization 1 389-399