Monomorphic Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder After Kidney Transplantation and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Treatments and Prognostic Factors

被引:0
作者
Li Fu
Jianlan Xie
Jun Lin
Jingshi Wang
Na Wei
Dayong Huang
Tingting Wang
Jing Shen
Xiaoge Zhou
Zhao Wang
机构
[1] Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University
来源
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion | 2017年 / 33卷
关键词
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder; Monomorphic; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Kidney transplantation; Tumor-associated macrophages; Rituximab;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoid neoplasms associated with immunosuppression following transplantation. Among PTLDs, monomorphic PTLD (m-PTLD) is the largest category; however, its characteristics and survival outcome are not fully understood because of low incidence. This study enrolled 30 adult patients with m-PTLD after kidney-transplantation (KT, n = 17) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT, n = 13) from January 1998 to December 2014. The incidence rates of m-PTLD were 0.74 and 3.63% in the KT and HSCT groups, respectively. M-PTLD patients in the HSCT group were younger and showed earlier onset, with EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBER) more frequently identified. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the main pathological type, and the digestive system was the most extranodal involvement site in m-PTLD after KT and HSCT. Among the 28 patients with DLBCL m-PTLD,the complete remission rate after rituximab treatment was higher than in patients not administered rituximab treatment (P = 0.038). With a median follow-up of 46 months after m-PTLD diagnosis, the estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 59.2 ± 9.1% in all patients, and 64.2 ± 11.8 and 52.7 ± 14.1% in the KT and HSCT groups, respectively (P = 0.741). ECOG PS, Ann Arbor stage, and CD68 IHC expression were independent prognostic factors for OS. M-PTLD is a rare but serious complication after transplantation. Ongoing efforts to standardize safe and effective treatment protocols would improve the poor overall survival. The independent prognostic factors contributed to risk-stratified treatment, and might be validated by larger studies.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 499
页数:7
相关论文
共 227 条
[1]  
Végso G(2011)Lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation-classification, incidence, risk factors, early detection and treatment options Pathol Oncol Res 17 443-454
[2]  
Hajdu M(2005)Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) after solid organ transplantation Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 56 155-167
[3]  
Sebestyén A(1982)Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Am J Clin Oncol 5 649-655
[4]  
Taylor AL(1989)Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: Cotswolds meeting J Clin Oncol 7 1630-1636
[5]  
Marcus R(2008)High numbers of tumor-associated macrophages have an adverse prognostic value that can be circumvented by rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma enrolled onto the GELA-GOELAMS FL-2000 trial J Clin Oncol 26 440-446
[6]  
Bradley JA(1992)Description of an in situ hybridization methodology for detection of Epstein-Barr virus RNA in paraffin-embedded tissues, with a survey of normal and neoplastic tissues Diagn Mol Pathol 1 246-255
[7]  
Oken MM(1999)Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI sponsored international working group J Clin Oncol 17 1244-230
[8]  
Creech RH(2004)Lymphomas after solid organ transplantation: a collaborative transplant study report Am J Transplant 42 222-2440
[9]  
Tormey DC(2013)Single-center analysis of biopsy-confirmed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: incidence, clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors Leuk Lymphoma 54 2433-4008
[10]  
Horton J(2009)How I treat EBV lymphoproliferation Blood 114 4002-170