Live Birth Rates in Women Under 38 Years Old with AMH Level < 1.2 ng/ml in the First In Vitro Fertilization + / − Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Retrospective Study and Arguments for Care

被引:0
作者
Karine Morcel
Philippe Merviel
Diane Pertuisel
Pandora James
Sarah Bouée
Mathilde Le Guillou
Jean-Jacques Chabaud
Sylvie Roche
Hortense Drapier
Aurore Perrin
Damien Beauvillard
机构
[1] Brest University Hospital,Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, ART Center
[2] Brest University Hospital,Department of Reproductive Biology, ART Center
来源
Reproductive Sciences | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
In vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Anti-Müllerian hormone; Pregnancy; Live birth; Predictive factors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many studies failed to show a predictive impact of AMH levels on the chances of pregnancy; however, acceptable pregnancy rates for young women with low AMH levels were observed in IVF + / − ICSI. The objectives of this retrospective study were to evaluate the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in the first IVF + / − ICSI cycle in women under 38 years old with AMH level < 1.2 ng/ml and to determine the arguments for care. We classified the women into three groups: group A: AMH < 0.4 ng/ml (n: 86); group B: AMH: 0.4 to 0.8 ng/ml (n: 90); and group C: AMH > 0.8 to < 1.2 ng/ml (n: 92). We recorded data on the patients’ characteristics, stimulation cycles, embryo cultures, and ongoing pregnancies. No difference was observed between the three groups for the number of embryos transferred, the clinical pregnancy, and the live birth rates (LBR) per embryo transfer (LBR/transfer: 24.1% in group A, 25.9% in group B, and 28.1% in group C). The young age of the women reassures about the oocyte quality, but a low level of AMH may raise concerns about a lower quantitative oocyte yield, leading to accelerated management of the couple in IVF + / − ICSI.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1142
页数:9
相关论文
共 274 条
  • [1] Seifer DB(2014)Is AMH a regulator of follicular atresia? J Assist Reprod Genet 31 1403-1407
  • [2] Merhi Z(2014)The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women Hum Reprod Update 20 370-385
  • [3] Dewailly D(2013)Which follicles make the most anti-Mullerian hormone in humans? Evidence for an abrupt decline in AMH production at the time of follicle selection Mol Hum Reprod 19 519-527
  • [4] Andersen CY(2008)AntiMüllerian hormone and ovarian dysfunction Trends Endocrinol Metab 19 340-347
  • [5] Balen A(2004)Anti-müllerian hormone is a promising predictor for the occurrence of the menopausal transition Menopause 11 601-606
  • [6] Broekmans F(2018)Does AMH relate to timing of menopause? Results of an individual patient data meta-analysis J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103 3593-3600
  • [7] Dilaver N(2011)ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria Hum Reprod 26 1616-1624
  • [8] Fanchin R(2016)The novel POSEIDON stratification of “low prognosis patients in assisted reproductive technology” and its proposed marker of successful outcome F1000Research 5 2911-130
  • [9] Jeppesen JV(2010)Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART) Hum Reprod Update 16 113-1346
  • [10] Anderson RA(2011)A validated model 42 of serum anti-müllerian hormone from conception to menopause PLoS One 6 e22024-1013