Multicenter open-label randomized phase II study of second-line panitumumab and irinotecan with or without fluoropyrimidines in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (PACIFIC study)

被引:0
作者
Naoki Nagata
Hiromichi Maeda
Keiichiro Ishibashi
Keiji Hirata
Akitaka Makiyama
Shigeyoshi Iwamoto
Hiroyoshi Takemoto
Mitsunobu Imasato
Yoichiro Yoshida
Yoshinori Munemoto
Chihiro Tanaka
Yoshitaka Morita
Yoshihiro Hotta
Atsushi Toyofuku
Takeshi Nagasaka
Satoshi Morita
Junichi Sakamoto
Hideyuki Mishima
机构
[1] Kitakyushu General Hospital,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery
[2] Kochi University,Cancer Treatment Center, Kochi Medical School Hospital
[3] Saitama Medical University,Department of Digestive Tract and General Surgery Saitama Medical Center
[4] University of Occupational and Environmental Health,Department of Surgery 1
[5] JCHO Kyushu Hospital,Department of Hematology and Oncology
[6] Aichi Medical University,Cancer Center
[7] Kinki Central Hospital,Department of Surgery
[8] Osaka Police Hospital,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery
[9] Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery
[10] Fukui Saiseikai Hospital,Department of Surgery
[11] Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center,Department of Surgery
[12] Kenporen Osaka Central Hospital,Department of Radiology
[13] Tokai Central Hospital,Department of Surgery
[14] National Hospital Organization Kokura Medical Center,Department of Surgery
[15] Kawasaki Medical School,Department of Clinical Oncology
[16] Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics
[17] Tokai Central Hospital,undefined
来源
Medical Oncology | 2019年 / 36卷
关键词
Panitumumab; Irinotecan; Fluoropyrimidine; KRAS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This phase II clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of second-line irinotecan and panitumumab treatment (IRI + Pmab) with that of irinotecan, fluoropyrimidines and panitumumab treatment (control) in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. In addition, early predictive markers of treatment efficacy were explored. Eighty patients were planned to be recruited. Due to a slow accrual rate, only 48 patients were recruited from 2012 to 2016, of which 23 were allocated to the control group and 25 were allocated to the IRI + Pmab group. The median progression-free survival was 254 days (95% confidence interval, 159–306) for control, and 190 days (95% confidence interval, 159–213) for IRI + Pmab (log-rank test, P = 0.26). The response rate without confirmation was 21.7% (5/23) for control and 40.0% (10/25) for IRI + Pmab. Neutropenia, leukopenia, and anorexia were the most common Grade 3/4 adverse events, and several early drop-outs from the treatment protocol were observed in the control group. As for the biomarkers, carcinoembryonic antigen and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) smoothly declined immediately after the initial dosing in patients with a partial response or stable disease. After starting treatment, LDH-1 and − 2 increased, while LDH-4 and − 5 decreased, irrespective of tumor response. However, exceptions were frequent. In conclusion, this study failed to prove the safety and efficacy of irinotecan and panitumumab treatment due to insufficient patient accrual. Although LDH and its isozymes changed after initiation of treatment, their ability to predict the tumor response may not surpass that of carcinoembryonic antigen levels.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Fitzmaurice C(2015)The global burden of cancer 2013 JAMA Oncol 1 505-527
  • [2] Dicker D(2017)Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality Gut. 66 683-691
  • [3] Pain A(2004)FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study J Clin Oncol 22 229-237
  • [4] Arnold M(2009)Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer J Clin Oncol 27 663-671
  • [5] Sierra MS(2008)Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study J Clin Oncol 26 2013-2019
  • [6] Laversanne M(2014)Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI {+/} panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer Ann Oncol 25 107-116
  • [7] Soerjomataram I(2008)EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer J Clin Oncol 26 2311-2319
  • [8] Jemal A(2012)Phase II study of irinotecan and cetuximab given every 2 weeks as second-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer Clin Colorectal Cancer 11 53-59
  • [9] Bray F(2012)Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status Investig New Drugs 30 1607-1613
  • [10] Tournigand C(2008)K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer N Engl J Med 359 1757-1765