Evaluation of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Lead Biomechanical Interaction with Brain Tissue

被引:0
作者
Logan E. Miller
Jillian E. Urban
Vincent M. Whelan
Walt W. Baxter
Stephen B. Tatter
Sidish S. Venkataraman
Chesney S. Oravec
Joel D. Stitzel
机构
[1] Wake Forest School of Medicine,Department of Biomedical Engineering
[2] Virginia Tech – Wake Forest University,School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences
[3] Medtronic,Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine
[4] Medical Center Boulevard,undefined
来源
Annals of Biomedical Engineering | 2023年 / 51卷
关键词
Daily head accelerations; Finite element model; Kinematics; Deep brain stimulation (DBS);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The current study aims to examine the effect of material properties on implanted leads used for deep brain stimulation (DBS) using finite element (FE) analysis to investigate brain deformation around an implanted DBS lead in response to daily head accelerations. FE analysis was used to characterize the relative motion of the DBS lead in a suite of fifteen cases sampled from a previously derived kinematic envelope representative of everyday activities describing translational and rotational pulse shape, magnitude, and duration. Load curves were applied to the atlas-based brain model (ABM) with a scaled Haversine acceleration pulse in four directions of rotation: + X, − Y, + Y, and + Z. In addition to the fifteen sampled cases, six experimental cases taken from a previous literature review were also simulated for comparison. The current investigation found that there was very little difference in brain response for the DBS leads with two different material properties. In general, the brain and DBS lead experienced the greatest deformation during rotation about the Z axis for similar load cases. In conclusion, this study showed that there was no significant difference in implanted DBS lead deformation based on lead material properties.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 102
页数:14
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [1] Blomstedt P(2005)Hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation: a ten year experience Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 147 1061-1064
  • [2] Hariz M(2010)Surgical and hardware complications of deep brain stimulation A seven-year experience and review of the literature Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 152 2053-2062
  • [3] Boviatsis EJ(2012)Deep brain stimulation hardware complications in patients with movement disorders: risk factors and clinical correlations Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 90 300-306
  • [4] Stavrinou LC(2009)Complications of deep brain stimulation: a collective review Asian J. Surg. 32 258-263
  • [5] Themistocleous M(2016)Mechanism of deep brain stimulation: inhibition, excitation, or disruption? Neuroscientist 22 313-322
  • [6] Kouyialis AT(2018)Double-target DBS for essential tremor: 8-contact lead for cZI and Vim aligned in the same trajectory Neurology 90 476-478
  • [7] Sakas DE(2018)Deep brain stimulation: clinical applications Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 41 385-394
  • [8] Carvallo JFB(2012)Cortico-subthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response Neuroimage 60 370-375
  • [9] Mostile G(2011)Head and neck loading in everyday and vigorous activities Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39 766-776
  • [10] Almaguer M(2008)What happened to posteroventral pallidotomy for Parkinson’s disease and dystonia? Neurotherapeutics 5 281-293