Cost analysis of neuromuscular blocking agents in the operating room: cisatracurium, atracurium, vecuronium and rocuronium

被引:0
作者
A. Ortega
C. Sarobe
J. Giráldez
M.J. Iribarren
机构
[1] University Hospital of Navarra,Pharmacy Department
[2] University Hospital of Navarra,Pharmacy Department
[3] University of Groningen,Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy
来源
Pharmacy World & Science | 2000年 / 22卷
关键词
Cisatracurium, atracurium; Costs; Neuromuscular blocking agents; Vecuronium; Rocuronium; Pharmacoeconomics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cisatracurium (C), Atracurium (A), Rocuronium (R) and Vecuronium (V) are four neuromuscular blockers (NMB) used in the operating room with similar efficacy, defined as adequate muscle relaxation, but different pharmacokinetics. C and A have organ-independent elimination, A is associated with histamine release and R has a shorter onset time. The objective of this study was to economically compare these four NMB from the hospital point of view in order to facilitate drug selection. A cost analysis was performed. Only direct costs were considered and data were collected through a retrospective chart review. A total of 151 patient charts were randomly selected. Differences between patients receiving one of the four NMB were evaluated by ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Then a multiple linear regression analysis was conducted. In the chart review, no significant difference was observed between the four groups of patients in age, weight or surgery duration (p>0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that atracurium was on average PTA 237 (1 Euro = PTA 166) cheaper per surgery than any other NMB after adjusting for other factors (p<0.01) and there is no significant difference in cost between the other three NMBs (p>0.1). We recommend the use of rocuronium when a quick onset is needed and the patient does not have hepatic failure, cisatracurium when a haemodynamic instability is possible and atracurium in the remaining cases. If just one NMB can be included in the drug formulary we would select cisatracurium due to its pharmacological advantages over atracurium with a small increment in cost.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 87
页数:5
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Bryson HM(1997)Cisatracurium besilate. A Review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in anaesthetic practice Drugs 53 848-66
[2]  
Faulds D.(1985)Atracurium: hypotension, tachycardia and bronchospasm Anesthesiology 62 645-6
[3]  
Siler JN(1987)The pharmacokinetics of atracurium isomers in vitro and in humans Anesthesiology 67 722-8
[4]  
Mager JG(1995)The clinical neuromuscular pharmacology of 51W89 in patients receiving nitrous oxide/opioid/barbiturate anesthesia Anesthesiology 82 1139-45
[5]  
Wyche MQ(1993)51W89: Dose-response, neuromuscular blocking profile and cardiovascular effects Anesthesiology 79 A945-31
[6]  
Tsui D(1996)Evaluation of cisatracurium, a new neuromuscular blocking agent, for tracheal intubation Can J Anaesth 43 925-30
[7]  
Graham GG(1993)Economic aspects of general anaesthesia Pharmacoeconomics 3 124-50
[8]  
Torda TA.(1996)A pharmacoeconomic analysis of neuromuscular blocking agents in the operating room Pharmacotherapy 16 942-59
[9]  
Belmont MR(1996)Canadian guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals Pharmacoeconomics 9 535-52
[10]  
Lien CA(1995)Economic analysis of health technologies and programmes. A Spanish proposal for methodological standardisation Pharmacoeconomics 8 245-6