Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism

被引:0
作者
Dawit Tibebu Tiruneh
Mieke De Cock
Ataklti G. Weldeslassie
Jan Elen
Rianne Janssen
机构
[1] KU Leuven,Centre for Instructional Psychology and Technology
[2] KU Leuven,Department of Physics and Astronomy & LESEC
[3] KU Leuven Group T,Science, Engineering and Technology Group
[4] KU Leuven,Educational Effectiveness and Evaluation
来源
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education | 2017年 / 15卷
关键词
Assessment; Domain-specific critical thinking; Physics; Science education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although the development of critical thinking (CT) is a major goal of science education, adequate emphasis has not been given to the measurement of CT skills in specific science domains such as physics. Recognizing that adequately assessing CT implies the assessment of both domain-specific and domain-general CT skills, this study reports on the development and validation of a test designed to measure students’ acquisition of CT skills in electricity and magnetism (CTEM). The CTEM items were designed to mirror the structural components of items identified in an existing standardized domain-general CT test, and targeted content from an introductory Electricity and Magnetism (E&M) course. A preliminary version of the CTEM test was initially piloted on three groups of samples: interviews with physics experts (N = 3), student cognitive interviews (N = 6), and small-scale paper and pencil administration (N = 19). Modifications were made afterwards and the test was administered to a different group of second-year students whose major was mechanical engineering (N = 45). The results showed that the internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .72) and inter-rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa = .83) of the CTEM test are acceptable. The findings overall suggest that the CTEM test can be used to measure the acquisition of domain-specific CT skills in E&M, and a good basis for future empirical research that focuses on the integration of CT skills within specific subject matter instruction. A broader CT assessment framework is proposed and possible research questions that can be addressed through the CTEM test are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 682
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abrami PC(2015)Strategies for teaching students to think critically: a meta-analysis Review of Educational Research 85 275-314
[2]  
Bernard RM(2011)Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert like thinking International Journal of Science Education 33 1289-1312
[3]  
Borokhovski E(2014)The thinking-about-derivative test for undergraduate students: development and validation International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 1279-1303
[4]  
Waddington DI(2002)Critical thinking and science education Science & Education 11 361-375
[5]  
Wade A(2013)Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered Higher Education Research and Development 32 529-544
[6]  
Persson T(1989)Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research Educational Researcher 18 4-10
[7]  
Adams WK(1993)Critical thinking assessment Theory Into Practice 32 179-186
[8]  
Wieman CE(1998)Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains American Psychologist 53 449-455
[9]  
Aydın U(1971)Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests Psychometrika 36 109-133
[10]  
Ubuz B(2010)Dispositional factors predicting Chinese students’ critical thinking performance Personality and Individual Differences 48 54-58