Does surgical position affect infective complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

被引:0
作者
Yusuf Kasap
Samet Senel
Emre Uzun
Muhammed Emin Polat
Antonios Koudonas
Cuneyt Ozden
机构
[1] Ankara City Hospital,Department of Urology
[2] Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,First Department of Urology, School of Medicine
来源
Urolithiasis | 2022年 / 50卷
关键词
Infective complication; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Prone; Supine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The downward orientation of the access sheath during supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) allows the faster evacuation of fluids and stone fragments. It theoretically can contribute to the reduction of the high intrarenal pressure-associated complications. We aimed to investigate whether there is a difference between prone and supine PCNL in terms of infective complications. This retrospective study includes 182 patients who underwent supine and prone PCNL due to kidney stones in our clinic between April 2020 and May 2022. Demographic (age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities), radiological (cumulative stone burden, stone density, number of stones, stone localization, stone laterality, presence of hydronephrosis), clinical (previous stone surgery, previous urinary tract) and perioperative (prone or supine position, surgery duration, hospitalization, success, non-infective and infective complications) data of all patients were evaluated. All patients were divided into two groups, the prone position group, and the supine position group. These two groups were compared in terms of pre and postoperative data above. Infective complications were observed in 16 (18%) patients in the prone position group and in 7 (7.5%) patients in the supine position group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.034). Surgery duration (OR = 1.041; 95% CI 1.021–1.061; p < 0.001), number of stones (OR = 4.09; 95% CI 1.093–7.309; p = 0.036), previous urinary tract infection (OR = 6.272; 95% CI 1.936–9.317; p = 0.002) and prone position (OR = 4.511; 95% CI 1.265–7.087; p = 0.02) were found as independent risk factors for infective complications. Prone position was proved as an independent predictor of postoperative infectious events. Supine PCNL will be further adopted as the standard PCNL approach by a continuously growing proportion of endourologists.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 771
页数:6
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Liatsikos E(2022)Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stone disease: which position? Prone position! Eur Urol Open Sci 35 6-1946
[2]  
Tsaturyan A(2022)Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: which position? Supine position! Eur Urol Open Sci 35 1-93
[3]  
Kallidonis P(2010)Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position J Endourol 24 1941-233
[4]  
Giusti G(2014)Is the supine position superior to the prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)? Urolithiasis 42 87-1063
[5]  
Pavia MP(2015)Lessons learned from the CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study World J Urol 33 223-117
[6]  
Rico L(2014)Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and prone position: a comparative study J Endourol 28 1058-1140
[7]  
Proietti S(2019)Comparative study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in the traditional prone position and in three different supine positions Int Braz J Urol 45 108-986
[8]  
Liu L(2020)Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis F1000Research 9 231-8
[9]  
Zheng S(2013)Urinary tract infections and post-operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy World J Urol 31 1135-381
[10]  
Xu Y(2016)Pre-and postoperative predictors of infection-related complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 30 982-2822