Cross-platform comparison of arbitrary quantum states

被引:0
作者
D. Zhu
Z. P. Cian
C. Noel
A. Risinger
D. Biswas
L. Egan
Y. Zhu
A. M. Green
C. Huerta Alderete
N. H. Nguyen
Q. Wang
A. Maksymov
Y. Nam
M. Cetina
N. M. Linke
M. Hafezi
C. Monroe
机构
[1] University of Maryland,Joint Quantum Institute
[2] University of Maryland,Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science
[3] University of Maryland,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
[4] IonQ,Department of Physics
[5] University of Maryland,Duke Quantum Center and Department of Physics
[6] Duke University,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
[7] Duke University,Chemical Physics Program and Institute for Physical Science and Technology
[8] University of Maryland,undefined
来源
Nature Communications | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As we approach the era of quantum advantage, when quantum computers (QCs) can outperform any classical computer on particular tasks, there remains the difficult challenge of how to validate their performance. While algorithmic success can be easily verified in some instances such as number factoring or oracular algorithms, these approaches only provide pass/fail information of executing specific tasks for a single QC. On the other hand, a comparison between different QCs preparing nominally the same arbitrary circuit provides an insight for generic validation: a quantum computation is only as valid as the agreement between the results produced on different QCs. Such an approach is also at the heart of evaluating metrological standards such as disparate atomic clocks. In this paper, we report a cross-platform QC comparison using randomized and correlated measurements that results in a wealth of information on the QC systems. We execute several quantum circuits on widely different physical QC platforms and analyze the cross-platform state fidelities.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE CROSS-PLATFORM QUANTUM CHEMISTRY SOFTWARE FOR COLLEGE CHEMISTRY EDUCATION
    Song, Mengxin
    Guo, Ping
    Peng, Shi
    [J]. CSEDU 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED EDUCATION, VOL 1, 2010, : 438 - 441
  • [22] Cross-Platform Comparison of Methods for Quantitative Metabolomics of Primary Metabolism
    Buescher, Joerg Martin
    Czernik, Dominika
    Ewald, Jennifer Christina
    Sauer, Uwe
    Zamboni, Nicola
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 81 (06) : 2135 - 2143
  • [23] The wxWindows cross-platform framework - A C++ framework for building cross-platform applications
    Zeitlin, V
    [J]. DR DOBBS JOURNAL, 2001, 26 (05): : 106 - +
  • [24] Disparity-preserved Deep Cross-platform Association for Cross-platform Video Recommendation
    Yu, Shengze
    Wang, Xin
    Zhu, Wenwu
    Cui, Peng
    Wang, Jingdong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 4635 - 4641
  • [25] CROSS-PLATFORM COMMUNICATION CLASSES
    LAM, RB
    [J]. DR DOBBS JOURNAL, 1995, 20 (03): : 20 - &
  • [26] A CROSS-PLATFORM BINARY DIFF
    COPPIETERS, K
    [J]. DR DOBBS JOURNAL, 1995, 20 (05): : 32 - &
  • [27] MiniCAD goes cross-platform
    Belleville, L
    [J]. COMPUTER GRAPHICS WORLD, 1996, 19 (03) : 12 - 12
  • [28] GIMLI: A Cross-Platform Permutation
    Bernstein, Daniel J.
    Koelbl, Stefan
    Lucks, Stefan
    Massolino, Pedro Maat Costa
    Mendel, Florian
    Nawaz, Kashif
    Schneider, Tobias
    Schwabe, Peter
    Standaert, Francois-Xavier
    Todo, Yosuke
    Viguier, Benoit
    [J]. CRYPTOGRAPHIC HARDWARE AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS - CHES 2017, 2017, 10529 : 299 - 320
  • [29] Personal Cross-Platform Reputation
    Bloemer, Johannes
    Loeken, Nils
    [J]. SECURITY AND TRUST MANAGEMENT, STM 2019, 2019, 11738 : 140 - 157
  • [30] WRITING CROSS-PLATFORM DISCS
    PAHWA, A
    [J]. CD-ROM PROFESSIONAL, 1995, 8 (06): : 124 - 126