From Student Engagement to Student Agency: Conceptual Considerations of European Policies on Student-Centered Learning in Higher Education

被引:0
作者
Manja Klemenčič
机构
[1] Harvard University,
来源
Higher Education Policy | 2017年 / 30卷
关键词
student-centered learning (SCL); student-centered learning environments (SCLEs); student engagement; student agency; European Higher Education Area (EHEA); quality assurance; higher education policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Student-centered learning (SCL) has entered center stage on the European higher education (HE) policy agenda after the Yerevan Ministerial Summit of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) in May 2015. It has become the key principle underlying the intended reforms toward enhancing the quality of teaching and learning in European HE. Despite the universal appeal, SCL remains poorly defined in policy documents and this ambiguity potentially jeopardizes its implementation. The article addresses the different instances and evocations of the SCL approach in EHEA policies. Furthermore, it seeks to clarify the conceptual foundations of SCL. Two propositions are put forward. First, SCL should be understood as a ‘meta-concept’. Such an understanding serves as a corrective to the eclectic use of SCL in association with a broad variety of policy issues. Second, the article questions the suitability of student engagement as a conceptual foundation of SCL. The main argument is that student engagement conceptually fails to sufficiently address student autonomy, self-regulation and choice, all of which have been highlighted by the literature as essential elements of SCL. The root concern of SCL is not propensity to different types of student action as implied in student engagement, but rather student agency as students’ capabilities to intervene in and influence their learning environments and learning pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 85
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Bandura A(2001)Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective Annual Review of Psychology 52 1-26
[2]  
Bromley P(2011)Student-Centeredness in Social Science Textbooks: Cross-National Analyses, 1970–2005 Social Forces 90 1-24
[3]  
Meyer JW(1998)What is agency? American Journal of Sociology 103 962-1023
[4]  
Ramirez F(2007)Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) Educational Psychologist 42 99-107
[5]  
Emirbayer M(2014)Theorising student engagement in higher education British Educational Research Journal 40 1005-1018
[6]  
Mische A(2006)Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching Educational Psychologist 41 75-86
[7]  
Hmelo-Silver CE(2015)Ahead of 2015 Bologna Ministerial Conference: a new agenda for the European Higher Education Area European Journal of Higher Education 5 1-3
[8]  
Golan Duncan R(2001)Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the national survey of student engagement Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 33 10-17
[9]  
Chinn CA(2009)The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student university relationship Studies in Higher Education 34 171-183
[10]  
Kahn PE(2000)The “Actors” of Modern Society: Cultural Rationalization and the Ongoing Expansion of Social Agency Sociological Theory 18 100-120