Rigorous Results for the Distribution of Money on Connected Graphs (Models with Debts)

被引:0
作者
Nicolas Lanchier
Stephanie Reed
机构
[1] Arizona State University,School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences
来源
Journal of Statistical Physics | 2019年 / 176卷
关键词
Interacting particle systems; Econophysics; Distribution of money; Models with debts; Primary 60K35; 91B72;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we continue our analysis of spatial versions of agent-based models for the dynamics of money that have been introduced in the statistical physics literature, focusing on two models with debts. Both models consist of systems of economical agents located on a finite connected graph representing a social network. Each agent is characterized by the number of coins she has, which can be negative in case she is in debt, and each monetary transaction consists in one coin moving from one agent to one of her neighbors. In the first model, that we name the model with individual debt limit, the agents are allowed to individually borrow up to a fixed number of coins. In the second model, that we name the model with collective debt limit, agents can borrow coins from a central bank as long as the bank is not empty, with reimbursements occurring each time an agent in debt receives a coin. Based on numerical simulations of the models on complete graphs, it was conjectured that, in the large population/temperature limits, the distribution of money converges to a shifted exponential distribution for the model with individual debt limit, and to an asymmetric Laplace distribution for the model with collective debt limit. In this paper, we prove exact formulas for the distribution of money that are valid for all possible social networks. Taking the large population/temperature limits in the formula found for the model with individual debt limit, we prove convergence to the shifted exponential distribution, thus establishing the first conjecture. Simplifying the formula found for the model with collective debt limit is more complicated, but using a computer to plot this formula shows an almost perfect fit with the Laplace distribution, which strongly supports the second conjecture.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1137
页数:22
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Chakraborti A(2000)Statistical mechanics of money: how saving propensity affects its distribution Eur. Phys. J. B 17 167-170
[2]  
Chakrabarti BK(2009)Kinetic models for wealth exchange on directed networks Eur. Phys. J. B 67 593-598
[3]  
Chatterjee A(2004)Pareto law in a kinetic model of market with random saving propensity Physica A 335 155-163
[4]  
Chatterjee A(2000)Statistical mechanics of money Eur. Phys. J. B 17 723-729
[5]  
Chakrabarti BK(2014)Kinetic models of immediate exchange Eur. Phys. J. B 87 170-179
[6]  
Manna SS(2015)The immediate exchange model: an analytical investigation Eur. Phys. J. B 88 19-24
[7]  
Dragulescu AA(2017)Rigorous proof of the Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution of money on connected graphs J. Stat. Phys. 167 160-172
[8]  
Yakovenko VM(2018)Rigorous results for the distribution of money on connected graphs J. Stat. Phys. 171 727-743
[9]  
Heinsalu E(2004)Statistical model with standard Phys. Rev. E 70 016104-555
[10]  
Patriarca M(2005) distribution Physica A 357 543-1725