Mycorrhizal mixtures affect the growth, nutrition, and physiological responses of soybean to water deficit

被引:0
作者
Ghazi N. Al-Karaki
Mark Williams
机构
[1] Jordan University of Science and Technology,Faculty of Agriculture
[2] Virginia Tech,School of Plant and Environmental Sciences
来源
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum | 2021年 / 43卷
关键词
Drought stress; Mycorrhizae; Stomatal conductance; Water relations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drought stress has a negative impact on crop growth and productivity worldwide. Plant symbionts such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can enhance plant growth and improve plant resistance to drought stress. AMF mixture inocula and plant responses to drought still require further study. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of non-inoculation (NM) or inoculation with three commercial AMF inocula containing a single or mixtures comprising different numbers of AMF species: M1 (Rhizophagus intraradices), M2 (Rhizophagus clarus, R. intraradices, Septoglomus deserticola, Funneliformis mosseae), and M3 (Rhizophagus intraradices, R. aggregatum, Funneliformis mosseae, Olaroideoglomus etunicatum) on growth, nutritional, and physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max L. cv. Hutcheson) grown in a greenhouse under different water stress levels [WW = well watered (90% FC), MS = medium (60% FC) and SS = severe stressed (30% FC)]. The AMF-inoculated plants had significantly higher plant biomass, chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, leaf water relations, and mineral contents in comparison to NM plants. Applied mycorrhizal inocula differed in their response to water-deficit conditions. M2 inoculant generally supported greater plant biomass, stomatal conductance, leaf water content, and leaf N, P, K, S, Mn, and Cu contents than M1 and M3 inocula, especially under MS and SS treatments. These results indicated that all mycorrhizal inocula supported plant growth both generally and with soil water deficit; however, M2-inoculated plants performed better than M1 and M3 under drought stress. Therefore, mycorrhizal inocula are effective for supporting soybean growth and offsetting the effects of drought and AMF technology that can support sustainable crop cultivation under soil water-deficit conditions. Different types of inocula have different effects, however, and thus require testing for individual crops.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Abbott LK(1982)The role of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agriculture and the selection of fungi for inoculation Aus J Agric Res 33 389-408
[2]  
Robson AD(2013)Synergistic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and spermine on amelioration of salinity stress of wheat ( Aus J Crop Sci 7 1525-1532
[3]  
Abdel-Fattah GM(2018) L. cv. Gimiza) Saudi J Biol Sci 25 1772-1780
[4]  
Ibrahim AH(2000)Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviates harmful effects of drought stress on damask Rose Mycorrhiza 10 51-54
[5]  
Al-Amri SM(1997)Growth of mycorrhizal tomato and mineral acquisition under salt stress Mycorrhiza 7 83-88
[6]  
Shoker AE(1998)Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress on growth and nutrient uptake of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance J Plant Nutr 21 891-902
[7]  
Abdel-Salam E(2004)Water stress and mycorrhizal isolate effects on growth, nutrient acquisition of wheat Mycorrhiza 14 263-269
[8]  
Alatar A(2011)Field response of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stress Saudi J Biol Sci 18 93-98
[9]  
El-Sheikh MA(2015)Alleviation of drought stress of marigold ( Mycorrhiza 25 13-24
[10]  
Al-Karaki GN(1981)) plants by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi J Am Soc Hort Sci 108 972-976