CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy

被引:0
作者
Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Mathias Prokop
机构
[1] Academic Medical Center AMC,Department for Radiology
[2] Utrecht Medical Center UMC,Department for Radiology
来源
European Radiology | 2008年 / 18卷
关键词
Pregnancy; Acute pulmonary embolism; CT angiography; Radiation dose; Image quality; Contrast injection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has been suggested by the Fleischner society as the first test following a negative leg ultrasound in pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. This editorial discusses the use of CTPA as a diagnostic tool in pregnant women and comments on the need for specifically adapting CT protocols during pregnancy in the light of new research describing a substantial number of non-diagnostic examinations in pregnant women if routine scanning protocols are used for CTA of the pulmonary arteries. Potential reasons for these high numbers of insufficient examinations are physiological changes occurring during pregnancy that lead to a hyperdynamic circulation, which reduces average enhancement of the pulmonary vasculature. In addition, there are possible breathing-related effects that include an increased risk for Valsalva manoeuvre with devastating effects for pulmonary vascular enhancement. Techniques to overcome these problems are discussed: bolus triggering with short start delays, high flow rates or high contrast medium concentration, preferential use of fast CT systems and the use of low kVp CT techniques. CT data acquisition during deep inspiration should be avoided and shallow respiration may be considered as an alternative to suspended breathing in this patient group. All these factors can contribute to optimization of the quality of pulmonary CTA in pregnant patients. It is time now to adapt our protocols and provide optimum care for this sensitive patient group.
引用
收藏
页码:2705 / 2708
页数:3
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Remy-Jardin M(2007)Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner society Radiology 245 315-329
  • [2] Pistolesi M(2006)Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol? Br J Radiol 79 441-444
  • [3] Goodman LR(2003)Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: a survey of practices and politics for CT pulmonary angiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 1495-1498
  • [4] Matthews S(1998)Pulmonary embolus in pregnant patients: survey of ventilation-perfusion imaging policies and practices Radiology 207 201-206
  • [5] Schuster ME(2003)MRI for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism J Magn Reson Imag 18 627-640
  • [6] Fishman JE(2005)Clinical validity of a negative computed scan of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review JAMA 293 2012-2017
  • [7] Copeland JF(2002)Suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: clinical presentation, results of lung scanning, and subsequent maternal and pediatric outcomes Arch Int Med 162 1170-1175
  • [8] Boisille PM(2000)Publication 84: Pregnancy and medical radiation Ann ICRP 30 1-43
  • [9] Reddy SS(2006)Investigating suspected pulmonary embolism during pregnancy Respir Med 100 1682-1687
  • [10] Villas PA(2008)Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivars exposed in utero or as young children J Nat Cancer Inst 100 428-436