Morphological MRI phenotypes of multiple sclerosis differ in resting-state brain function

被引:0
作者
Daniela Pinter
Christian F. Beckmann
Franz Fazekas
Michael Khalil
Alexander Pichler
Thomas Gattringer
Stefan Ropele
Siegrid Fuchs
Christian Enzinger
机构
[1] Medical University of Graz,Department of Neurology
[2] Medical University of Graz,Research Unit for Neuronal Plasticity and Repair
[3] Radboud University Nijmegen,Donders Institute, Cognitive Neuroscience Department and Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
[4] Medical University of Graz,Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology
来源
Scientific Reports | / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We aimed to assess differences in resting-state functional connectivity (FC) between distinct morphological MRI-phenotypes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Out of 180 MS patients, we identified those with high T2-hyperintense lesion load (T2-LL) and high normalized brain volume (NBV; a predominately white matter damage group, WMD; N = 37) and patients with low T2-LL and low NBV (N = 37; a predominately grey matter damage group; GMD). Independent component analysis of resting-state fMRI was used to test for differences in the sensorimotor network (SMN) between MS MRI-phenotypes and compared to 37 age-matched healthy controls (HC). The two MS groups did not differ regarding EDSS scores, disease duration and distribution of clinical phenotypes. WMD compared to GMD patients showed increased FC in all sub-units of the SMN (sex- and age-corrected). WMD patients had increased FC compared to HC and GMD patients in the central SMN (leg area). Only in the WMD group, higher EDSS scores and T2-LL correlated with decreased connectivity in SMN sub-units. MS patients with distinct morphological MRI-phenotypes also differ in brain function. The amount of focal white matter pathology but not global brain atrophy affects connectivity in the central SMN (leg area) of the SMN, consistent with the notion of a disconnection syndrome.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 88 条
[21]  
Seidl Z.(1992)DispImage: a display and analysis tool for medical images Rev Neuroradiol 5 489-13045
[22]  
Havrdova E.(2009)Correspondence of the brain’ s functional architecture during activation and rest PNAS 106 13040-162
[23]  
Kalincik T.(2018)How changes in brain activity and connectivity are associated with motor performance in people with MS NeuroImage Clin. 17 153-40
[24]  
Benedict R. H. B.(2018)Functional parcellation using time courses of instantaneous connectivity NeuroImage 170 31-57
[25]  
Horakova D.(2012)Large-scale neuronal network dysfunction in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Neurology 79 1449-3
[26]  
Hemond CC(2005)‘Importance sampling’: A strategy to overcome the clinical/MRI paradox in MS? J. Neurol. Sci. 237 1-78
[27]  
Schoonheim MM(2016)Longitudinal fMRI studies: Exploring brain plasticity and repair in MS Mult. Scler. 22 269-41S
[28]  
Filippi M(2007)Functional MRI in multiple sclerosis J. Neuroimaging 17 36S-1443
[29]  
Rocca MA(2015)Brain functional plasticity at rest and during action in multiple sclerosis patients J. Clin. Neurosci. 22 1438-51
[30]  
De Meo E(2005)Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: using disability and disease duration to rate disease severity Neurology 64 1144-5