Morphological MRI phenotypes of multiple sclerosis differ in resting-state brain function

被引:0
作者
Daniela Pinter
Christian F. Beckmann
Franz Fazekas
Michael Khalil
Alexander Pichler
Thomas Gattringer
Stefan Ropele
Siegrid Fuchs
Christian Enzinger
机构
[1] Medical University of Graz,Department of Neurology
[2] Medical University of Graz,Research Unit for Neuronal Plasticity and Repair
[3] Radboud University Nijmegen,Donders Institute, Cognitive Neuroscience Department and Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
[4] Medical University of Graz,Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology
来源
Scientific Reports | / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We aimed to assess differences in resting-state functional connectivity (FC) between distinct morphological MRI-phenotypes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Out of 180 MS patients, we identified those with high T2-hyperintense lesion load (T2-LL) and high normalized brain volume (NBV; a predominately white matter damage group, WMD; N = 37) and patients with low T2-LL and low NBV (N = 37; a predominately grey matter damage group; GMD). Independent component analysis of resting-state fMRI was used to test for differences in the sensorimotor network (SMN) between MS MRI-phenotypes and compared to 37 age-matched healthy controls (HC). The two MS groups did not differ regarding EDSS scores, disease duration and distribution of clinical phenotypes. WMD compared to GMD patients showed increased FC in all sub-units of the SMN (sex- and age-corrected). WMD patients had increased FC compared to HC and GMD patients in the central SMN (leg area). Only in the WMD group, higher EDSS scores and T2-LL correlated with decreased connectivity in SMN sub-units. MS patients with distinct morphological MRI-phenotypes also differ in brain function. The amount of focal white matter pathology but not global brain atrophy affects connectivity in the central SMN (leg area) of the SMN, consistent with the notion of a disconnection syndrome.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Compston A(2008)Multiple sclerosis Lancet 372 1502-17
[2]  
Coles A(2005)MRI as a marker for disease heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis Neurology 65 1071-1076
[3]  
Bielekova B(2014)MRI phenotypes based on cerebral lesions and atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis J. Neurol. Sci. 346 250-254
[4]  
Tauhid S(2006)Can MRI reveal phenotypes of multiple sclerosis? Magn. Reson. Imaging 24 475-481
[5]  
Neema M(2015)Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis is a process separate from inflammation: Yes Mult. Scler. 21 1626-1628
[6]  
Healy BC(2009)Patients’ stratification and correlation of brain magnetic resonance imaging parameters with disability progression in multiple sclerosis Eur. Neurol. 61 278-284
[7]  
Weiner HL(2016)Identification of multiple sclerosis patients at highest risk of cognitive impairment using an integrated brain magnetic resonance imaging assessment approach European Journal of Neurology 24 292-301
[8]  
Bakshi R(2019)MRI phenotypes in MS: Longitudinal changes and miRNA signatures Neurol. Neuroimmunol. NeuroInflammation 6 1-12
[9]  
Guttmann CRG(2012)Functional plasticity in MS: friend or foe? Neurology 79 1418-9
[10]  
Meier DS(2016)Functional MRI in investigating cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis Acta Neurol. Scand. 134 39-46