A general equilibrium model of two group conflict with endogenous intra-group sharing rules

被引:0
作者
Suk Jae Noh
机构
[1] Hallym University,
来源
Public Choice | 1999年 / 98卷
关键词
Resource Allocation; Equilibrium Model; General Equilibrium; Group Income; Productive Sector;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores the interactions among intra-group sharing rules, the competition between two groups over the common pool of output, and the allocation of resources between productive and appropriate activities. In the interior solution, the use of egalitarian method for the distribution of group income among members plays no distributional role but only affects the allocation of resources. It releases resources into the productive sector from the group that adopts the egalitarian rule by making the internal conflict among the members less intense. The sequential choice of intra-group sharing rules and resource allocations produce the adoption of fully egalitarian intra-group sharing rules in both groups. These rules minimize the amount of resources allocated to appropriate activities and maximize the welfare level of all individuals in the economy. This result suggests that inter-group competition with the use of egalitarian principle in the distribution of group income among group members, which is not available to the Hobbesian state of nature, is one of the cheaper social devices in restraining individuals from engaging in costly appropriative activities.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 267
页数:16
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Becker G.(1983)A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 370-400
  • [2] Grossman H.I.(1991)A general equilibrium model of insurrections American Economic Review 81 912-921
  • [3] Grossman H.I.(1995)Swords or plowshares?: A theory of the security of claims to property Journal of Political Economy 103 1275-1288
  • [4] Kim M.(1995)The dynamics of withingroup and betweengroup interaction Journal of Mathematical Economics 24 655-687
  • [5] Hausken K.(1988)The analytics of continuing conflict Synthese 76 201-233
  • [6] Hirshleifer J.(1989)Conflict and rentseeking success functions: Ratio vs. difference models of relative success Public Choice 63 101-112
  • [7] Hirshleifer J.(1991)The paradox of power Economics & Politics 3 177-200
  • [8] Hirshleifer J.(1995)Anarchy and its breakdown Journal of Political Economy 103 26-52
  • [9] Hirshleifer J.(1995)Endogenous sharing rules in collective group rentseeking Public Choice 85 31-44
  • [10] Lee S.(1991)Rentseeking with nonidentical sharing rules Public Choice 71 43-50