Sexual Isolation and Cuticular Hydrocarbon Differences between Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba

被引:0
作者
Flore Mas
Jean-Marc Jallon
机构
[1] Université Paris Sud XI,Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de l'Apprentissage, de la Mémoire et de la Communication, UMR
来源
Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2005年 / 31卷
关键词
reproductive isolation; courtship; hydrocarbon pheromone;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba are two sister species inhabiting Saõ Tomé island. Previous studies showed that both species display strong reproductive isolation, although they can produce a few viable hybrids. Our study tried to understand the mechanism of this ethological isolation between two allopatric strains. A strong sexual isolation was confirmed, with a marked asymmetry. Comparisons of latency times to either courtship or copulation suggest that males do not discriminate females, whereas D. yakuba females, but not D. santomea females, accept their homospecifics more quickly. Cuticular hydrocarbon compositions of both species and sexes were also established with gas chromatography (GC) and GC/mass spectrometry analysis. All have (Z)-7-tricosene as their major compound. There are several quantitative differences between species for few minor compounds. The largest difference concerns n-heneicosane, which is more abundant in D. santomea than in D. yakuba flies (up to seven times more between males). A similar quantitative difference was also found in a pair of sympatric strains. Furthermore, D. yakuba males artificially perfumed with n-heneicosane were discriminated negatively by D. yakuba females, suggesting a role for this compound in the sexual isolation between these two species.
引用
收藏
页码:2747 / 2752
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Cobb M.(1990)Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Anim. Behav. 39 1058-1067
[2]  
Jallon J. M.(2002) species sub-group Evolution 56 2424-2434
[3]  
Coyne J. A.(1983)Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Biol. Rev. 58 275-292
[4]  
Kim S. Y.(2005) and Behav. Genet. 35 279-295
[5]  
Chang A. S.(1984)Functional aspects of Behav. Genet. 14 441-478
[6]  
Lachaise D.(1987) courtship Evolution 41 294-302
[7]  
Elwyn S.(2000)Cuticular hydrocarbons: Their evolution and roles in Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B Biol. Sci. 267 1487-1495
[8]  
Ewing A.(2002) pheromonal communication Evolution 56 2262-2277
[9]  
Ferveur J.-F.(2004)A few chemical words exchanged between Genetica 120 195-212
[10]  
Jallon J. M.(1994) during courtship and mating Evolution 48 112-121