Pre- and post-operative plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in patients with newly diagnosed gliomas

被引:0
作者
Hatim Husain
William Savage
Stuart A. Grossman
Xiaobu Ye
Peter C. Burger
Allen Everett
Chetan Bettegowda
Luis A. Diaz
Cherie Blair
Katharine E. Romans
Matthias Holdhoff
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Brain Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
[2] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Department of Oncology
[3] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Department of Pathology
[4] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Department of Neurosurgery
[5] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Department of Pediatrics
[6] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics at Johns Hopkins
来源
Journal of Neuro-Oncology | 2012年 / 109卷
关键词
Glial fibrillary acidic protein; Glioma; Glioblastoma; Biomarker; Circulating tumor marker;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Therapies that disrupt or repair blood–brain barrier integrity can result in major changes in MRI images even when the tumor volume remains constant. Thus, a reliable blood-based tumor biomarker could significantly improve clinical care and research studies in these patients. This study was performed to assess plasma concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in patients with high- and low-grade gliomas before and after debulking surgery. Pre-operative plasma was collected from 33 patients with radiation- and chemotherapy-naïve gliomas. Additional plasma was collected 24–48 h post-operatively from 23 of these patients. Plasma GFAP (pGFAP) concentrations were determined using an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay and were analyzed as a function of tumor grade, tumor GFAP expression, the integrity of the blood-brain barrier, and post-operative status. Detectable pGFAP levels (≥0.04 ng/mL) were found pre-operatively in 52 % of patients and post-operatively in 96 %. Detectable pGFAP was more common in patients with WHO grade IV (100 %) than WHO grade III (56 %) or WHO grade II gliomas (20 %). No patient with undetectable GFAP had WHO grade IV glioma. Higher pGFAP concentrations were also associated with contrast enhancement but not related to tumor GFAP expression. GFAP is commonly detected in the plasma of patients with high-grade gliomas. pGFAP levels rise rather than fall following debulking surgery which is probably a result of surgical trauma. GFAP remains a potentially informative plasma biomarker for gliomas. Longitudinal studies are required to correlate pGFAP levels with patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 127
页数:4
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Brandsma D(2008)Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas Lancet Oncol 9 453-461
[2]  
Stalpers L(2008)MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients J Clin Oncol 26 2192-2197
[3]  
Taal W(2011)Controversies in the adjuvant therapy of high-grade gliomas Oncologist 16 351-358
[4]  
Sminia P(2005)Low-molecular weight caldesmon as a potential serum marker for glioma Clin Cancer Res 11 4388-4392
[5]  
van den Bent MJ(2005)Cathepsin D is a potential serum marker for poor prognosis in glioma patients Cancer Res 65 5190-5194
[6]  
Brandes AA(2006)YKL-40 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 as potential serum biomarkers for patients with high-grade gliomas Clin Cancer Res 12 5698-5704
[7]  
Franceschi E(2006)Release of glial fibrillary acidic protein is related to the neurovascular status in acute ischemic stroke Eur J Neurol 13 1118-1123
[8]  
Tosoni A(2011)Glial fibrillary acidic protein as a brain injury biomarker in children undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Pediatr Crit Care Med 12 572-579
[9]  
Blatt V(2006)Increased GFAP and S100beta but not NSE serum levels after subarachnoid haemorrhage are associated with clinical severity Eur J Neurol 13 632-638
[10]  
Pession A(2010)GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study Neurology 75 1786-1793