Spatial Contiguity and Spatial Split-Attention Effects in Multimedia Learning Environments: a Meta-Analysis

被引:0
作者
Noah L. Schroeder
Ada T. Cenkci
机构
[1] Wright State University,Department of Leadership Studies in Education and Organizations
[2] Northern Kentucky University,Department of Political Science, Criminal Justice, and Organizational Leadership
来源
Educational Psychology Review | 2018年 / 30卷
关键词
Spatial contiguity effect; Spatial contiguity principle; Split attention; Cognitive load; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Spatial split-attention effects have been noted in the research literature, where, under split-attention conditions, integrating text and diagrams has been shown to be effective. From this literature grew the spatial contiguity principle (or spatial contiguity effect), which states that people learn more when related words and pictures are displayed spatially near one another. Research has shown both effects to influence learning; however, little is known about the conditions in which integrated designs are most effective. This meta-analysis examines the influence of integrated designs across numerous moderator variables in order to improve our understanding of under which conditions integrated designs influence learning. A random effects meta-analysis of 58 independent comparisons (n = 2426) produced an overall effect size of g = 0.63 (p < 0.001). Moderator analyses indicated that integrated designs have benefited learning across many intervention-related and context-related moderator variables. Practical and theoretical implications of the findings are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 701
页数:22
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Adesope OO(2012)Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis Journal of Educational Psychology 104 250-263
[2]  
Nesbit JC(2003)Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning Educational Psychologist 38 53-61
[3]  
Brunken R(2005)Meta-analysis of the modality effect Learning and Instruction 15 313-331
[4]  
Plass JL(2006)Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects Learning and Instruction 16 511-525
[5]  
Leutner D(2015)The applicability of visible learning to higher education Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology 1 79-91
[6]  
Ginns P(2005)Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample BMC Medical Research Methodology 5 1-10
[7]  
Ginns P(2011)Cognitive load theory: How many types of cognitive load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review 23 1-19
[8]  
Hattie J(2012)Instructional benefits of spoken words: A review of cognitive load factors Educational Research Review 7 145-159
[9]  
Hozo SP(1999)Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction Applied Cognitive Psychology 13 351-371
[10]  
Djulbegovic B(2014)Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load Learning and Instruction 30 32-42