Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors

被引:0
|
作者
Andrew V. Anzalone
Luke W. Koblan
David R. Liu
机构
[1] Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT,Merkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare
[2] Harvard University,Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology
[3] Harvard University,Howard Hughes Medical Institute
来源
Nature Biotechnology | 2020年 / 38卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The development of new CRISPR–Cas genome editing tools continues to drive major advances in the life sciences. Four classes of CRISPR–Cas-derived genome editing agents—nucleases, base editors, transposases/recombinases and prime editors—are currently available for modifying genomes in experimental systems. Some of these agents have also moved rapidly into the clinic. Each tool comes with its own capabilities and limitations, and major efforts have broadened their editing capabilities, expanded their targeting scope and improved editing specificity. We analyze key considerations when choosing genome editing agents and identify opportunities for future improvements and applications in basic research and therapeutics.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 844
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Germline Editing of Drosophila Using CRISPR-Cas9-Based Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors
    Thakkar, Nirav
    Hejzlarova, Adela
    Brabec, Vaclav
    Dolezel, David
    CRISPR JOURNAL, 2023, 6 (06): : 557 - 569
  • [22] Directed Evolution of CRISPR-Cas9 Base Editors
    Winter, Jackson
    Perez-Pinera, Pablo
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 37 (11) : 1151 - 1153
  • [23] CRISPR-Cas genome editors: structures, mechanisms and applications
    Jinek, M.
    FEBS OPEN BIO, 2018, 8 : 6 - 6
  • [24] Improved split prime editors enable efficient in vivo genome editing
    Wei, Rongwei
    Yu, Zhenxing
    Ding, Lihong
    Lu, Zhike
    Yao, Keyi
    Zhang, Heng
    Huang, Binglin
    He, Miao
    Ma, Lijia
    CELL REPORTS, 2025, 44 (01):
  • [25] Cytosine base editors optimized for genome editing in potato protoplasts
    Westberg, Ida
    Carlsen, Frida Meijer
    Johansen, Ida Elisabeth
    Petersen, Bent Larsen
    FRONTIERS IN GENOME EDITING, 2023, 5
  • [26] Large DNA deletions occur during DNA repair at 20-fold lower frequency for base editors and prime editors than for Cas9 nucleases
    Hwang, Gue-Ho
    Lee, Seok-Hoon
    Oh, Minsik
    Kim, Segi
    Habib, Omer
    Jang, Hyeon-Ki
    Kim, Heon Seok
    Kim, Youngkuk
    Kim, Chan Hyuk
    Kim, Sun
    Bae, Sangsu
    NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 9 (01): : 79 - 92
  • [27] Controllable genome editing with split-engineered base editors
    Kiara N. Berríos
    Niklaus H. Evitt
    Rachel A. DeWeerd
    Diqiu Ren
    Meiqi Luo
    Aleksia Barka
    Tong Wang
    Caroline R. Bartman
    Yemin Lan
    Abby M. Green
    Junwei Shi
    Rahul M. Kohli
    Nature Chemical Biology, 2021, 17 : 1262 - 1270
  • [28] CRISPR-Cas9 DNA Base-Editing and Prime-Editing
    Kantor, Ariel
    McClements, Michelle E.
    MacLaren, Robert E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (17) : 1 - 22
  • [29] Photoactivatable base editors for spatiotemporally controlled genome editing in vivo
    Zou, Quan
    Lu, Yi
    Qing, Bo
    Li, Na
    Zhou, Ting
    Pan, Jinbin
    Zhang, Xuejun
    Zhang, Xuening
    Chen, Yupeng
    Sun, Shao-Kai
    BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 302
  • [30] Bringing base editing to the clinic: The next generation of genome editors
    Flugel, Christian L.
    Abou-el-Enein, Mohamed
    MOLECULAR THERAPY METHODS & CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31