Prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials in comatose children: a systematic literature review

[1] Ashwal S(2004)Pediatric vegetative state: epidemiological and clinical issues Neuro Rehabil 19 349-360

[2] Carter BG(2001)Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury Crit Care Med 29 178-186

[3] Butt W(2003)Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma Crit Care Med 31 960-967

[4] Robinson LR(2005)Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review Int Care Med 31 765-775

[5] Micklesen PJ(2006)Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review). Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology 67 203-210

[6] Tirschwell DL(2001)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis J Clin Epidemiol 54 1046-1055

[7] Lew HL(2003)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 3 25-676

[8] Carter BG(1994)Guidelines for meta-analysis evaluating diagnostic test Ann Intern Med 120 667-1316

[9] Butt W(2004)Evaluating heterogeneity in cumulative meta-analyses BMC Med Res Methods 4 18-624

[10] Wijdicks EF(1993)Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data analytic approaches and some additional considerations Stat Med 12 1293-845

[1] Ashwal S(2004)Pediatric vegetative state: epidemiological and clinical issues Neuro Rehabil 19 349-360

[2] Carter BG(2001)Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury Crit Care Med 29 178-186

[3] Butt W(2003)Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma Crit Care Med 31 960-967

[4] Robinson LR(2005)Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review Int Care Med 31 765-775

[5] Micklesen PJ(2006)Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review). Report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology 67 203-210

[6] Tirschwell DL(2001)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis J Clin Epidemiol 54 1046-1055

[7] Lew HL(2003)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 3 25-676

[8] Carter BG(1994)Guidelines for meta-analysis evaluating diagnostic test Ann Intern Med 120 667-1316

[9] Butt W(2004)Evaluating heterogeneity in cumulative meta-analyses BMC Med Res Methods 4 18-624

[10] Wijdicks EF(1993)Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data analytic approaches and some additional considerations Stat Med 12 1293-845