Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India

被引:0
作者
Shuvabrata Chatterjee
A. P. Krishna
A. P. Sharma
机构
[1] CIFRI,Department of Remote Sensing
[2] Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR),undefined
[3] Birla Institute of Technology (BIT),undefined
来源
Environmental Earth Sciences | 2014年 / 71卷
关键词
Watershed management; Soil erosion; USLE; Remote sensing; LULC change; Subarnarekha River Basin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Undulating landscapes of Chhotanagpur plateau of the Indian state of Jharkhand suffer from soil erosion vulnerability of varying degrees. An investigation was undertaken in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha River Basin falling within this state. An empirical equation known as Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was utilized for estimating the soil loss. Analysis of remote sensing satellite data, digital elevation model (DEM) and geographical information system (GIS)–based geospatial approach together with USLE led to the soil erosion assessment. Erosion vulnerability assessment was performed by analyzing raster grids of topography acquired from Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global DEM data. LANDSAT TM and ETM+ satellite data of March 2001 and March 2011 were used for inferring the land use–land cover characteristics of the watershed for these years, respectively. USLE equation was computed within the GIS framework to derive annual soil erosion rates and also the areas with varying degrees of erosion vulnerability. Erosion vulnerability units thus identified covered five severity classes of erosion ranging from very low (0–5 ton ha−1 yr−1) to very severe (> 40 ton ha−1 yr−1). Results indicated an overall increase of erosion in the year 2011 as compared to the erosion computed for the year 2001. Maximum soil erosion rate during the year 2001 was found up to 40 ton ha−1 yr−1, whereas this went up to 49.80 ton ha−1 yr−1 for the year 2011. Factors for the increase in overall erosion could be variation in rainfall, decrease in vegetation or protective land covers and most important but not limited to the increase in built-up or impervious areas as well.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 374
页数:17
相关论文
共 153 条
  • [31] Renard KG(2010)Morphometric analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds using GIS and remote sensing techniques: a case study of Odisha, India Int J Geomat Geosci 1 501-510
  • [32] Moldenhauer WC(1997)Urbanization flood, frequency and salmon abundance in Puget Lowlan Streams J Am Water Resour Assoc 33 1289-1297
  • [33] Hammer TR(1994)Estimation of runoff, soil loss and USLE parameters for Doon Valley Indian J Soil Conserv 22 1-9
  • [34] Harbor J(2005)Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover Catena 61 131-154
  • [35] Hollis GE(2008)Soil landscapes, land cover change and erosion features of the Central Plateau region of Tigrai, Ethiopia: photo-monitoring with an interval of 30 years Catena 75 55-64
  • [36] Luckett JK(1988)A comparison of channel erosion in small urban and rural catchments, Armidale, New South Wales Earth Surf Process Landf 13 1-7
  • [37] Jabbar MT(2004)An indicator system for assessing soil erosion in the Loess Plateau gully regions: a case study in the Wangdonggou watershed of China Pedosphere 14 37-44
  • [38] Jasrotia AS(2006)Implications of decadal changes in precipitation and land use policy to soil erosion in Basilicata, Italy Catena 65 138-151
  • [39] Singh R(2009)Geostatistical interpolation of SLC-off Landsat ETM+ images ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64 654-664
  • [40] Jordan G(2002)Runoff and soil loss responses to changes in precipitation: a computer simulation study J Soil Water Conserv 57 7-16