Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India

被引:0
作者
Shuvabrata Chatterjee
A. P. Krishna
A. P. Sharma
机构
[1] CIFRI,Department of Remote Sensing
[2] Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR),undefined
[3] Birla Institute of Technology (BIT),undefined
来源
Environmental Earth Sciences | 2014年 / 71卷
关键词
Watershed management; Soil erosion; USLE; Remote sensing; LULC change; Subarnarekha River Basin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Undulating landscapes of Chhotanagpur plateau of the Indian state of Jharkhand suffer from soil erosion vulnerability of varying degrees. An investigation was undertaken in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha River Basin falling within this state. An empirical equation known as Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was utilized for estimating the soil loss. Analysis of remote sensing satellite data, digital elevation model (DEM) and geographical information system (GIS)–based geospatial approach together with USLE led to the soil erosion assessment. Erosion vulnerability assessment was performed by analyzing raster grids of topography acquired from Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global DEM data. LANDSAT TM and ETM+ satellite data of March 2001 and March 2011 were used for inferring the land use–land cover characteristics of the watershed for these years, respectively. USLE equation was computed within the GIS framework to derive annual soil erosion rates and also the areas with varying degrees of erosion vulnerability. Erosion vulnerability units thus identified covered five severity classes of erosion ranging from very low (0–5 ton ha−1 yr−1) to very severe (> 40 ton ha−1 yr−1). Results indicated an overall increase of erosion in the year 2011 as compared to the erosion computed for the year 2001. Maximum soil erosion rate during the year 2001 was found up to 40 ton ha−1 yr−1, whereas this went up to 49.80 ton ha−1 yr−1 for the year 2011. Factors for the increase in overall erosion could be variation in rainfall, decrease in vegetation or protective land covers and most important but not limited to the increase in built-up or impervious areas as well.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 374
页数:17
相关论文
共 153 条
  • [11] Smith JL(1982)Porous pavement: research, development, and demonstration J Transp Eng 108 244-258
  • [12] Biesemans J(1981)Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI metric units J Soil Water Conserv 36 355-359
  • [13] Meirvenne MV(1972)Stream channel enlargement due to urbanization Water Resour Res 8 1530-1540
  • [14] Gabriels D(1994)A practical method for estimating the impact of land use change on surface runoff, groundwater recharge and wetland hydrology J Am Plan Assoc 60 91-104
  • [15] Cebecauer T(1976)The response of natural river channels to urbanization: two case studies from southeast England J Hydrol 30 351-363
  • [16] Hofierka J(2003)Application of GIS to estimate soil erosion using RUSLE Geo-spatial Inf Sci 6 34-37
  • [17] Chou WC(2006)Modeling runoff and soil erosion in a catchment area using GIS in Himalayan region, India Environ Geol 51 29-37
  • [18] Del Mar LT(2006)Historical land use changes and their impact on sediment fluxes in the Balaton basin (Hungary) Agric Ecosyst Environ 108 119-133
  • [19] Mitchel Aide T(2011)Assessment of the effects of vegetation on soil erosion risk by water: a case study of the Batta watershed in Tunisia Environ Earth Sci 64 707-719
  • [20] Scatena FN(2001)Watershed prioritization using remote sensing and geographical information system: a case study from Guhiya, India J Arid Environ 49 465-475