Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India

被引:0
作者
Shuvabrata Chatterjee
A. P. Krishna
A. P. Sharma
机构
[1] CIFRI,Department of Remote Sensing
[2] Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR),undefined
[3] Birla Institute of Technology (BIT),undefined
来源
Environmental Earth Sciences | 2014年 / 71卷
关键词
Watershed management; Soil erosion; USLE; Remote sensing; LULC change; Subarnarekha River Basin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Undulating landscapes of Chhotanagpur plateau of the Indian state of Jharkhand suffer from soil erosion vulnerability of varying degrees. An investigation was undertaken in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha River Basin falling within this state. An empirical equation known as Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was utilized for estimating the soil loss. Analysis of remote sensing satellite data, digital elevation model (DEM) and geographical information system (GIS)–based geospatial approach together with USLE led to the soil erosion assessment. Erosion vulnerability assessment was performed by analyzing raster grids of topography acquired from Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global DEM data. LANDSAT TM and ETM+ satellite data of March 2001 and March 2011 were used for inferring the land use–land cover characteristics of the watershed for these years, respectively. USLE equation was computed within the GIS framework to derive annual soil erosion rates and also the areas with varying degrees of erosion vulnerability. Erosion vulnerability units thus identified covered five severity classes of erosion ranging from very low (0–5 ton ha−1 yr−1) to very severe (> 40 ton ha−1 yr−1). Results indicated an overall increase of erosion in the year 2011 as compared to the erosion computed for the year 2001. Maximum soil erosion rate during the year 2001 was found up to 40 ton ha−1 yr−1, whereas this went up to 49.80 ton ha−1 yr−1 for the year 2011. Factors for the increase in overall erosion could be variation in rainfall, decrease in vegetation or protective land covers and most important but not limited to the increase in built-up or impervious areas as well.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 374
页数:17
相关论文
共 153 条
  • [1] Ali S(2005)Evaluation of the universal soil loss equation (USLE) in semi-arid and sub-humid climates of India Appl Eng Agric 21 217-225
  • [2] Sharda VN(1996)Impervious surface coverage—the emergence of a key environmental indicator J Am Plan Assoc 62 243-258
  • [3] Arnold CL(2010)Conditional simulation of USLE/RUSLE soil erodibility factor by geostatistics in a mediterranean catchment, Turkey Environ Earth Sci 60 1179-1187
  • [4] Gibbons CJ(1994)Evaluation of a redefined surface cover sub-factor for use in RUSLE J Range Manag 47 74-78
  • [5] Baskan O(2000)Extending the RUSLE with the Monte Carlo error propagation technique to predict long-term average on-site sediment accumulation J Soil Water Conserv 55 35-42
  • [6] Hicrettin C(2008)The consequences of land-cover changes on soil erosion distribution in Slovakia Geomorphology 98 187-198
  • [7] Suat A(2010)Modeling watershed scale soil loss prediction and sediment yield estimation Water Resour Manage 24 2075-2090
  • [8] Gunay E(1998)The effect of land use on soil erosion in the Guadiana watershed in Puerto Rico Carib J Sci 34 298-307
  • [9] Benkobi L(2004)The role of land use–land cover on runoff generation and sediment yield at a microplot scale, in a small Mediterranean catchment J Arid Environ 57 99-116
  • [10] Trlica MJ(1995)Non-linear responses of soil erosion to climate change: a modeling study on the UK South Downs Catena 25 365-387