Real-world treatment persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiating DMARDs in Germany—a health insurance claims data analysis; [Therapiepersistenz unter realen Bedingungen bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis nach Beginn einer DMARD-Therapie – eine Analyse von Abrechnungsdaten der Krankenversicherungen in Deutschland]

被引:0
作者
Fiehn C. [1 ]
Zinke S. [2 ]
Haas J.S. [3 ]
Meise D. [3 ]
Theil J. [3 ]
Gurrath M. [4 ]
Orzechowski H.-D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Baden-Baden, Beethovenstr. 2, Baden-Baden
[2] Rheuma Praxis Zinke, Berlin
[3] Xcenda GmbH, Hanover
[4] Galapagos Biopharma Germany GmbH, Munich
关键词
Antirheumatic agents; Biological therapy; Rheumatoid arthritis; Therapeutics; Treatment patterns;
D O I
10.1007/s00393-023-01323-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate treatment patterns in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany who had previously received conventional synthetic (cs) or biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: Patients with RA who initiated treatment with a csDMARD, bDMARD, or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor between 2017 and 2018 and who had previously received csDMARD or bDMARD therapy were retrospectively selected from the Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH (InGef). Time on treatment and discontinuation risk were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression identified variables associated with an increased discontinuation risk. Results: A total of 990 patients had received prior csDMARD therapy; 375 had received prior bDMARD therapy. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors and JAK inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed DMARD class in those previously treated with a csDMARD or bDMARD, respectively. In both cohorts, more patients received DMARD monotherapy than combination therapy. In the prior csDMARD cohort, median time on treatment was 276, 252, and 148 days with JAK inhibitors, TNF‑α inhibitors, and csDMARDs, respectively, and those treated with JAK or TNF‑α inhibitors were less likely to discontinue treatment than those on csDMARDs (log-rank test p-value < 0.01 for both comparisons); no significant differences were found within the prior bDMARD cohort. Conclusion: This is among the first detailed analyses of RA treatment patterns in a real-world setting in Germany since the introduction of JAK inhibitors. TNF‑α inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed DMARD after failure of an initial csDMARD, while JAK inhibitors were the most common among patients previously treated with a bDMARD. In both groups, monotherapy with bDMARD or targeted synthetic DMARD was common. In the prior csDMARD cohort, treatment duration was significantly longer with JAK or TNF‑α inhibitors than with csDMARDs. © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 753
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Fiehn C., Holle J., Iking-Konert C., Et al., S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs, Z Rheumatol, 77, pp. 35-53, (2018)
[2]  
Smolen J.S., Landewe R.B.M., Bijlsma J.W.J., Et al., EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update, Ann Rheum Dis, 79, pp. 685-699, (2020)
[3]  
Albrecht K., Strangfeld A., Risk profile of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: an update from the RABBIT register, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 146, pp. 998-1002, (2021)
[4]  
Steffen A., Holstiege J., Klimke K., Et al., Patterns of the initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in incident rheumatoid arthritis: a German perspective based on nationwide ambulatory drug prescription data, Rheumatol Int, 38, pp. 2111-2120, (2018)
[5]  
Neubauer S., Cifaldi M., Mittendorf T., Et al., Biologic TNF inhibiting agents for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: persistence and dosing patterns in Germany, Health Econ Rev, 4, (2014)
[6]  
Jacob L., Chevalier T., Kostev K., Persistence with biological drugs in patients treated in rheumatology practices in Germany, Rheumatol Int, 39, pp. 525-531, (2019)
[7]  
Andersohn F., Walker J., Characteristics and external validity of the German Health Risk Institute (HRI) database, Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 25, pp. 106-109, (2016)
[8]  
Ergebnisse der Bevölkerungsfortschreibung auf Grundlage des Zensus 2011, (2016)
[9]  
Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., Et al., A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation, J Chronic Dis, 40, pp. 373-383, (1987)
[10]  
Lauper K., Iudici M., Mongin D., Et al., Effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors, abatacept, IL6-inhibitors and JAK-inhibitors in 31 846 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 19 registers from the ‘JAK-pot’ collaboration, Ann Rheum Dis, 81, pp. 1358-1366, (2022)