Clean energy selection for sustainable development by using entropy-based decision model with hesitant fuzzy information

被引:0
作者
Raghunathan Krishankumar
Dragan Pamucar
Fausto Cavallaro
Kattur Soundarapandian Ravichandran
机构
[1] Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham,Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering
[2] University of Defence Belgrade,Department of Logistics, Military Academy
[3] University of Molise,Department of Economics
[4] Rajiv Gandhi National Institute of Youth Development,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Clean energy; Decision-making; Entropy measure; Hesitant fuzzy set;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Smart cities development is an ambitious project launched in India in 2015 with around 14 billion USD. Smart city mission program primarily aimed at reducing the carbon footprint and encouraging green and sustainable practices. Under this context, clean energy usage for demand fulfillment became the prime focus. India’s geographic location gifts the nation with diverse clean energy sources (CES). Owing to the multiple sustainable criteria that are both conflicting and correlated, there is an urge for a multi-criteria decision approach. Previously, literatures on CES selection have not been able to grab the hesitation properly and handle uncertainty effectively. Since the human mind is dynamic, hesitation is an integral part of choice making. Hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) is a generic set that captures hesitation better. Driven by these claims, in this work, a new framework for CES selection is developed. Attitude-driven entropy measure is proposed for criteria weight assessment, and a mathematical model is formulated for ranking CESs. Together, these methods constitute a decision framework that (i) considers the attitude of experts and captures hesitation during rating process and (ii) acquires partial personal choices from experts before ranking CESs. To testify the framework, a case study from a smart city within Tamil Nadu (a state in India) is explained. Sensitivity analysis reveals the robustness of the framework, and comparison with other works showcases the novel innovations of the proposal.
引用
收藏
页码:42973 / 42990
页数:17
相关论文
共 194 条
[1]  
Alizadeh R(2020)Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method Energy Policy 137 997-1011
[2]  
Soltanisehat L(2020)Wind turbine evaluation using the hesitant fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method with a case in Turkey J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38 17431-17444
[3]  
Lund PD(2021)Site selection for waste vegetable oil and waste battery collection boxes: a GIS-based hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach Environ Sci Pollut Res 28 1-25
[4]  
Zamanisabzi H(2016)Evaluation of combined heat and power (CHP) systems using fuzzy shannon entropy and fuzzy TOPSIS Sustainability (Switzerland) 8 407-416
[5]  
Beskese A(2018)Concentrated solar power (CSP) hybridized systems. Ranking based on an intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria algorithm J Clean Prod 179 12-17
[6]  
Camci A(2016)An interval- valued hesitant fuzzy ranking method based on group decision analysis for green supplier selection IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 12-19
[7]  
Temur GT(2017)The smart city concept in the 21st century Procedia Eng 181 121107-334
[8]  
Erturk E(2020)Selecting the most viable renewable energy source for Brazilian ports using the FITradeoff method J Clean Prod 260 325-1787
[9]  
Çalış Boyacı A(2019)Performance evaluation of Indian states in the renewable energy sector for making investment decisions: a managerial perspective J Clean Prod 224 1779-20
[10]  
Şişman A(2010)Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis Appl Mathe Model 34 1-21