Edited books in the Social Sciences and Humanities: Characteristics and collaboration analysis

被引:0
作者
Truyken L. B. Ossenblok
Tim C. E. Engels
机构
[1] University of Antwerp,Centre for Research & Development Monitoring (ECOOM), Faculty of Political and Social Sciences
[2] Antwerp Maritime Academy,undefined
来源
Scientometrics | 2015年 / 104卷
关键词
Co-authorship; Co-editorship; Social Sciences and Humanities; Flanders; Collaboration; Edited books; 01; 94 en; A14; 038;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Monographs and edited books are important in scholarly communication, especially in the Social Sciences and Humanities. An edited book is a collection of chapters written by different authors, gathered and harmonized by one or more editors. This article analyses the characteristics and collaboration patterns of edited books in the Social Sciences and Humanities as practiced in Flanders, the Northern Dutch speaking part of Belgium. It is based upon a comprehensive set of 753 peer reviewed edited books, of which at least one of the editors has a Flemish university affiliation, and the 12,913 chapters published therein. The article analyses various characteristics of edited books, i.e. the distribution over publishers, the places of publication, language use, the presence of introductions and conclusions, the occurrence of co-editorship and co-authorship, and the number of unique authors and book chapters per volume. Almost half of the edited books are published with about 5 % of the publishers. English is the dominant publication language for all places of publication. Writing a conclusion seems rather uncommon. All in all, about 90 % of all volumes are co-edited. Edited books in the Social Sciences have a more diverse authorship then edited books in the Humanities. In general, the more co-authorship for articles occurs within a discipline, the more co-authorship occurs for book chapters, whereas the number of editors is independent from this trend.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 237
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Ajiferuke I(1988)Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research Scientometrics 14 421-433
  • [2] Burell Q(2001)Reflections in scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present and future Scientometrics 52 365-377
  • [3] Tague J(2012)Peer review: Fetishes, fallacies and perceptions Journal of Scholarly Publishing 43 137-147
  • [4] Beaver DD(2013)Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties Journal of Informetrics 7 861-873
  • [5] Derricourt R(2012)Editing academic books in the humanities and social sciences: Maximizing impact for effort Journal of Scholarly Publishing 44 61-74
  • [6] Didegah F(1991)Theory of collaboration and collaborative measures Information Processing and Management 27 177-202
  • [7] Thelwall M(2012)Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000–2009 Scientometrics 93 373-390
  • [8] Edwards L(2008)A guide for preparation of an academic edited book Substance abuse 29 1-4
  • [9] Egghe L(1999)A tapestry of kings: Edited volumes and the growth of knowledge in religious studies Religion 29 243-259
  • [10] Engels TCE(2013)Opportunities and limitations of the Book Citation Index Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 1388-1398