Does spatial resolution matter in the estimation of average annual soil loss by using RUSLE?—a study of the Urmodi River Watershed (Maharashtra), India

The study investigates the influence of multispectral satellite data’s spatial resolution on land degradation in the Urmodi River Watershed in which Kaas Plateau, a UNESCO World Heritage site, is located. Specifically, the research focuses on soil erosion and its risk zonation. The study employs Landsat 8 (30-m resolution) and Sentinel-2 (10-m resolution) data to assess soil erosion risk. The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) is used to quantify the average annual soil erosion output denoted by (A), by using its factors such as rainfall (R), soil erodibility (K), slope-length (LS), cover management (C), and support practices (P). R-factor was computed from MERRA-2 rainfall data, K-factor was derived from field soil sample-based analysis, LS factor was from Cartosat Digital Elevation Model-based data. The C factor was derived from NDVI of Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2, and the P factor was prepared from LULC derived from Landsat 8, and Sentinel-2 was incorporated in the final integration. The soil erosion hazard map ranged from slight to extremely severe. Remote sensing (RS)-based parameters like Land Use Land Cover (LULC) are derived from the Landsat 8 and Sentine-2 satellite data and used to compute the difference in the final outcome of the integration. The study found similarities in average annual soil loss (A) in plain areas, but differences in final soil erosion risk zone (A) were influenced by LULC map variations due to different cell sizes, P factor, and slope gradient. Notable differences were observed in soil erosion risk categories, particularly in high to very severe zones, with a cumulative difference of 73.85 km2. In addition to this, a scatterplot between the final outputs was computed and found the moderate (R2 = 42.08%) correlation between Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 imagery-based final average annual soil erosion (A) of RUSLE. The study area encompasses various landforms ranging from the plateau to pediplain, and in such situation, the water-led soil erosion categories vary depending on terrain condition along with its biophysical factors and, hence, need to analyze the need of such factors on the average annual soil erosion quantification. Different spatial resolution has an effect on the final output, and hence, there is a need to track this change at various spatial resolutions. This analysis highlights the significant impact of spatial resolution on land degradation assessment, providing precise identification of surface features and enhancing soil erosion risk zoning accuracy.