Development of an accelerated MSCT protocol (Triage MSCT) for mass casualty incidents: Comparison to MSCT for single-trauma patients

被引:22
作者
Körner M. [1 ]
Krötz M. [1 ]
Kanz K.-G. [2 ]
Pfeifer K.-J. [1 ]
Reiser M. [1 ]
Linsenmaier U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, 80336 Munich
[2] Department of Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 80336 Munich
关键词
Contingency plan; Emergency; Mass casualty incident; MSCT; Multiple trauma; Triage;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-006-0485-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During multiple casualty incidents (MCI) emergency radiology departments have to deal with a large number of patients with suspected severe trauma within a short period of time. The aim of this study was to develop a suitable accelerated multislice computed tomography (MSCT) protocol to increase patient throughput for this kind of emergency situation. We presumed a scenario of 15 patients being admitted to the trauma service with suspicion of severe injuries after a MCI over a period of 2 h. An accelerated Triage MSCT protocol was developed and evaluated for MSCT scanner productivity (patients per hour) and time (minutes) needed for a total MSCT body workup using an anthropomorphic phantom. In addition, time (minutes) for transfer and preparation was measured. These timeframes were compared to a control group consisting of 144 single patients with multiple trauma undergoing standard MSCT according to our trauma room protocol. All MSCT studies were conducted using a 4-detector row scanner. (1) For the study group (Triage MSCT), average time for patient transfer and preparation was 2.9 min (2.5-4.3 min), mean CT examination time was 2.1 min (1.7-2.4 min); image reconstruction took 4.0 min (3.3-4.3 min). Total time in scanner room was 8.9 min (7.7-11.3 min), resulting in a maximal productivity of 6.7 patients per hour. Image transfer to the digital picture archive and communication system archive was completed after an average 9.5 min (8.9-10.8 min). (2) For the control group (single casualty MSCT), the mean time for patient transfer and preparation was 20.4 min (9.0-39.2 min), mean examination time was 6.0 min (3.1-11.3 min). Times for image reconstructions were not recorded in the patient series. Mean total time in scanner room was 25.3 min (11.0-72.4 min), resulting in a patient throughput of 2.4 patients per hour. MSCT has potential to serve as a powerful tool in triage of multiple casualty patients. The introduction of a Triage MSCT scanning protocol resulted in an increase of patient throughput per hour by a factor of almost 3. © Am Soc Emergency Radiol 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 209
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Levi L., Michaelson M., Admi H., Et al., National strategy for mass casualty situations and its effects on the hospital, Prehospital Disaster Med, 17, pp. 12-16, (2002)
[2]  
Arnold J.L., Tsai M.C., Halpern P., Et al., Mass-casualty, terrorist bombings: Epidemiological outcomes, resource utilization, and time course of emergency needs (Part I), Prehospital Disaster Med, 18, pp. 220-234, (2003)
[3]  
Einav S., Feigenberg Z., Weissman C., Et al., Evacuation priorities in mass casualty terror-related events: Implications for contingency planning, Ann Surg, 239, pp. 304-310, (2004)
[4]  
Frykberg E.R., Principles of mass casualty management following terrorist disasters, Ann Surg, 239, pp. 319-321, (2004)
[5]  
Kilner T., Hall F.J., Triage decisions of United Kingdom police firearms officers using a multiple-casualty scenario paper exercise, Prehospital Disaster Med, 20, pp. 40-46, (2005)
[6]  
Pointer J.E., Levitt M.A., Young J.C., Et al., Can paramedics using guidelines accurately triage patients?, Ann Emerg Med, 38, pp. 268-277, (2001)
[7]  
Rodoplu U., Arnold J.L., Tokyay R., Et al., Mass-casualty terrorist bombings in Istanbul, Turkey, November 2003: Report of the events and the prehospital emergency response, Prehospital Disaster Med, 19, pp. 133-145, (2004)
[8]  
Salhanick S.D., Sheahan W., Bazarian J.J., Use and analysis of field triage criteria for mass gatherings, Prehospital Disaster Med, 18, pp. 347-352, (2003)
[9]  
Garner A., Lee A., Harrison K., Et al., Comparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms, Ann Emerg Med, 38, pp. 541-548, (2001)
[10]  
Hauser H., Bohndorf K., Radiologic emergency management in multiple trauma cases, Radiologe, 38, pp. 637-644, (1998)