Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Infants and Toddlers

被引:0
作者
Scott P. Pentiuk
Claire Kane Miller
Ajay Kaul
机构
[1] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,Department of Pediatrics
[2] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,Department of Speech Pathology
[3] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
[4] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
来源
Dysphagia | 2007年 / 22卷
关键词
Eosinophilic esophagitis; Oral aversion; Pediatrics; Deglutition; Deglutition disorders;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Feeding refusal is often described in conjunction with the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) in pediatric patients; however, there are little data regarding the specific clinical manifestations and effective management of this condition in very young children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presentation of EE in infants and toddlers referred to the Interdisciplinary Feeding Team Clinic of a tertiary referral center and to document responses to treatment. Database matching was performed (from January 2000 to June 2003) to identify infants and toddlers diagnosed with EE who had been referred to the Interdisciplinary Feeding Team Clinic. Endoscopic features required for a diagnosis of EE included esophageal mucosal furrowing, erythema, exudates, or decreased vascular markings. Histologic features of EE were more than 24 eosinophils per high-power field (HPF), thickening of basal cell layer, and papillary (rete peg) lengthening or elongation. All study patients were treated with a combination of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and fluticasone (swallowed). In addition, elemental diet was instituted in those documented to have a food allergy. Treatment success was defined by an improved oral intake, adequate weight gain, and improved endoscopic and histologic findings at 3–6-month followup. A total of 15 subjects [mean age = 19.9 months (SD = 9.7 months)] who fulfilled the entry criteria during the study period were identified. All 15 children had documented endoscopic improvement and 14/15 children had histologic resolution of EE after therapy. In 13 of the 15 children, this translated to clinical improvement as well.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 48
页数:4
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Winter HS(1982)intraepithelial eosinophils: a new diagnostic criterion for reflux esophagitis Gastroenterology 83 818-823
[2]  
Madara JL(2004)Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID) J Allergy Clin Immunol 113 11-28
[3]  
Stafford RJ(2004)Clinical and immunopathologic effects of swallowed Fluticasone for eosinophilic esophagitis Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2 568-575
[4]  
Grand RJ(2000)‘Explosion’ of eosinophilic esophagitis in children Pediatr News 34 4-941
[5]  
Quinlin JE(2004)eosinophilic esophagitis N Engl J Med 351 940-419
[6]  
Goldman H(2005)Eosinophilic esophagitis: escalating epidemiology? J Allergy Clin Immunol 115 418-1512
[7]  
Rothenburg ME(1995)Eosinophilic esophagitis attributed to gastroesophageal reflux: improvement with an amino-based formula Gastroenterology 109 1503-385
[8]  
Noel RJ(1998)Primary esophagitis in children: Successful treatment with oral corticosteroids J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 26 380-1430
[9]  
Putnam PE(2000)The spectrum of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis beyond infancy: A clinical series of 30 children Am J Gastroenterol 95 1422-927
[10]  
Collins MH(2001)Fluticasone in eosinophilic corrugated ringed esophagus Am J Gastroenterol 96 926-212