Evaluation of GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making methods for sanitary landfill site selection: the case of Sivas city, Turkey

被引:0
作者
Can Bülent Karakuş
Demet Demiroğlu
Ayşen Çoban
Alptekin Ulutaş
机构
[1] Sivas Cumhuriyet University,Urban And Regional Planning Department, Faculty of Architecture
[2] Kilis 7 Aralık University,Fine Arts and Design
[3] Sivas Cumhuriyet University,Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture
来源
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | 2020年 / 22卷
关键词
Sanitary landfill; AHP; SAW; CODAS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landfill is the most common method used to eliminate municipal solid waste in developing countries. As in all developing residential units, Sivas city is also encountering a major solid waste problem menacing both public health and environment. This study analyzes the 7 criteria (geological structure, land ability class, transportation, groundwater, surface water, residential areas, and existing land use) utilized for solid waste landfill area preference reasons by employing some Geographical Information System (GIS) based, multi-criteria decision-making methods such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). Evaluation of alternative areas defined by AHP and SAW methods is conducted with the help of Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS). The study area was classified as “most suitable”, “suitable”, “averagely suitable”, “too little suitable” and “not suitable” in terms of their sanitary landfill properties. According to AHP and SAW analyses results, it was determined that a large part of the study area (respectively, 46.82% and 27.81%) is within the category of “averagely suitable”. After the application based on GIS oriented multi-criteria decision-making analysis, 4 alternative places as solid waste disposal areas were recommended by taking environmental and physical factors into consideration. AHP–CODAS and SAW–CODAS methods were mutually utilized to rank these 4 areas according to their suitability. As a result, “Area1” in integrated weights (AHP and SAW)–CODAS was selected as the most appropriate place for sanitary permanent landfill.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 272
页数:18
相关论文
共 167 条
[1]  
Santhosh LG(2018)Landfill site selection based on reliability concepts using the Drastic method and AHP integrated with GIS—a case study of Bengaluru city, India Georisk Asses and Manag Risk Eng Sys Geohaz 12 234-252
[2]  
Sivakumar Babu GL(1996)The impact of leachate recirculation on municipal solid waste landfill operating characteristics Waste Manag Res 14 337-346
[3]  
Reinhart DR(2014)Municipal solid waste landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process method for Tafresh Town Mid East J Sci Res 22 1294-1307
[4]  
Basel Al-Yousfi A(2015)Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: a review Waste Manag 35 318-328
[5]  
Elahi A(2015)Integrating and utilizing AHP and GIS for landfill site selection Appl Mech Mater 773 100-104
[6]  
Samadyar H(2013)Landfill site requirements on the rock environment: a case study Eng Geol 154 20-35
[7]  
Soltani A(2005)Siting MSW landfills with a spatial multiple criteria analysis methodology Waste Manag 25 818-832
[8]  
Hewage K(2011)GIS and the analytic hierarchy process for regional landfill site selection in transitional countries: a case study from Serbia Environ Manag 49 445-458
[9]  
Reza B(2010)Combining AHP with GIS for landfill site selection: a case study in the Lake Beysehir catchment area (Konya, Turkey) Waste Manag 30 2037-2046
[10]  
Sadiq R(2006)Landfill site selection by using geographic information systems Environ Geol 49 376-388