Supreme Court decision favours biosimilars

被引：0

|

作者：

Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

机构：

[1] Foley & Lardner LLP,

[2] 3000 K Street N.W.,undefined

[3] Suite 600,undefined

[4] Washington,undefined

[5] DC 20007-5109,undefined

[6] USA,undefined

[7] and the editor of Foley & Lardner LLP's PharmaPatentsBlog.com.,undefined

来源：

Nature Reviews Drug Discovery | 2017年 / 16卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：521 / 522

页数：1

相关论文

共 50 条

[41] SUPREME-COURT DECISION - EASIER ON EMPLOYERS
FRITZ, NR
PERSONNEL, 1989, 66 (08) : 4 - 4
[42] COMPLIANCE AND SUPREME COURT DECISION-MAKING
JOHNSON, RM
WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW, 1967, (01) : 170 - 185
[43] Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada
Weiden, David L.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2008, 41 (04): : 1027 - 1028
[44] “Nest”Decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine 6 April 2023 – Case No. 110107005“Nest”Decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2025, 56 (2) : 417 - 429
[45] Court of appeals send use value law decision to supreme court
Anon
Timber Producer, 2001, (11):
[46] THE BARENBLATT DECISION OF THE SUPREME-COURT AND THE ACADEMIC PROFESSION
FUCHS, RF
AAUP BULLETIN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS, 1959, 45 (03): : 333 - 338
[47] APPRAISING THE US SUPREME COURT'S PHILIPP DECISION
Curran, Vivian Grosswald
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW, 2021, 83 (02) : 303 - 321
[48] What the US Supreme Court decision means for wetlands
Gardner, Royal C.
NATURE, 2023, 618 (7964) : 215 - 215
[49] An empirical analysis of Supreme Court Justices' decision making
Lim, Y
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02) : 721 - 752
[50] Supreme Court decision might strengthen biomarker patents
不详
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2010, 9 (08) : 586 - 586

← 1 2 3 4 5 →